On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:21:05PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:34:19AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> (3) libvirtd runs the libguestfs appliance. It forwards the socket
> back to us over the libvirt connection. I think this is what Dan had
> in mind, and it's reasonably easy to integrate this into both libvirtd
> and libguestfs.
[To explain this option in more detail]
(a) Modify guestfs_add_domain in the case where the libvirt connection
is remote. How do we know if the libvirt connection is remote?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-April/msg00890.html
As Dan pointed out elsewhere, any libvirt URI that has a host element
is probably "remote" even if the host element is "localhost" (since
that might indicate some sort of cross-user/-policy access).
(b) Add a libvirt API to open up a remote libguestfs. Something like
this:
int virConnectStartGuestfsDaemon (
virConnectPtr conn, /* libvirt connection */
const char *unix_path, /* path to local unix domain socket */
unsigned int flags
);
(c) At the remote end, libvirtd launches the libguestfs appliance in qemu.
- How would it do this?
- Would it reuse libguestfs code for this?
- Would it call febootstrap-supermin-helper itself? Or another method?
- Do we need to pass any libguestfs parameters over (eg. path? qemu?
verbose? append? memsize? selinux?)
- Where do qemu log messages go to?
(d) The virtio serial port is forwarded back to the libvirt client
side, causing the Unix domain socket to be opened.
(e) The libguestfs library now calls guestfs_set_attach_method with
the name of the socket.
Since you don't mind using libvirt APIs internally if they #ifdef'able,
then how practical is it to change the I/O routines inside libguestfs
to optionally use virStreamRecv/virStreamSend directly, instead of
having to proxy the stream via a client side UNIX socket ?
Daniel
--
|: