On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:00:21AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>step virDrvDomainMigrateFinish() might be needed, it could for
example
>resume on the target side and also verify the domain is actually okay.
>That could improve error handling and feels a lot more like a transactional
>system where you really want an atomic work/fail operation and nothing
>else.
Yes. It's important to note that the internals may be changed later,
although that may complicate things if we want to allow people to run
incompatible versions of the daemons. [Another email on that subject is
coming up after this one].
We need to treat the binary on-the-wire ABI for the client<->daemon the
same way as our public ELF library ABI. Never break it, only add to it.
So if we think the internals client<->server needs may change we should
avoid including this code in a release until we're more satisfied with
its longevity.
Regards,
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|