On 01/12/2010 03:48 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 03:26:28PM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
Since virDispatchError is now responsible for invoking the error callback, give it the same semantics as ReportError, which will skip VIR_ERR_OK (which is encountered when no error was raised).
This fixes invoking the error callback after every non-erroring API call.
Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com> --- src/util/virterror.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/util/virterror.c b/src/util/virterror.c index e2128b9..78974ee 100644 --- a/src/util/virterror.c +++ b/src/util/virterror.c @@ -603,8 +603,12 @@ virDispatchError(virConnectPtr conn) if (!err) return;
- /* Set a generic error message if none is already set */ + /* We never used to raise ERR_OK, so maintain existing behavior */ if (err->code == VIR_ERR_OK) + return; + + /* Set a generic error message if none is already set */ + if (!err->message) virErrorGenericFailure(err);
/* Copy the global error to per-connection error if needed */
We should only ever be invoking virDispatchError() in error paths, so if err->code == VIR_ERR_OK, this means we do need set a generic message because the earlier code indicated an error but forgot to report one. So I don't think this is correct.
Ah, I think I wanted to check VIR_ERR_NONE here actually. virDispatchError is called regardless of whether an error is actually raised, so it may receive a zero'd out/empty virLastErrorObject, which is what I'm trying to avoid reporting. - Cole