On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:39:46PM +0200, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 06/21/2012 07:51 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just noticed libvirt tries to use the -numa option in a way that qemu
>never understood: if a node is configured to have a non-contiguous set
>of CPUs, it tries to generate a command-line option that looks like:
>
>"-numa node,nodeid=...,cpus=0,2,4,mem=..."
> ^^^^^
>
>But this format was never supported by qemu. This format is even a bit
>weird, as "," is an option separator, and it is being used as a
>separator _inside_ an option.
Exactly this was the reason back then to not support non-contiguous
set of CPUs. Inside qemu there is no reason why this shouldn't work,
it was just hard to write on the command line. So after a short
discussion we decided to drop this for the time being. If you have a
great idea how to specify this (I think a comma will not work,
because it will be catched earlier), I am all ears.
Lets just use a ';' or ':' as the seperator instead ?
Daniel
--
|:
http://berrange.com -o-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|:
http://libvirt.org -o-
http://virt-manager.org :|
|:
http://autobuild.org -o-
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|:
http://entangle-photo.org -o-
http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|