On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:10:43PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote:
[...]
>fine once the shared lib issue is fixed. I assume virsh remote
support
>works
>now, right ?
Yes, see the screenshot in the first post in this thread.
dohh, missed it (for my defense my mail setup makes hard to show
attached images :-)
>>+ * Copyright (c) 2001, 02 Motoyuki Kasahara
>>+ *
>>+ * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
>>+ * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
>>+ * are met:
>>+ * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
>>+ * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
>>+ * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
>>+ * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
>>+ * documentation and/or other materials provided with the
>>distribution.
>
> Ouch, that's not really something we can embbed generally ...
I'm going to look at an alternate implementation (in gnulib), but what
is the problem with this license?
Well it asks for the copyright and those 3 conditions to be listed in
all documentation (I think it's one of the BSD advertizing clause variants)
and i really don't want to inflict this to people who build tools on top
of libvirt.
daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/