On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 03:10:43PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: [...]
fine once the shared lib issue is fixed. I assume virsh remote support works now, right ?
Yes, see the screenshot in the first post in this thread.
dohh, missed it (for my defense my mail setup makes hard to show attached images :-)
+ * Copyright (c) 2001, 02 Motoyuki Kasahara + * + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions + * are met: + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
Ouch, that's not really something we can embbed generally ...
I'm going to look at an alternate implementation (in gnulib), but what is the problem with this license?
Well it asks for the copyright and those 3 conditions to be listed in all documentation (I think it's one of the BSD advertizing clause variants) and i really don't want to inflict this to people who build tools on top of libvirt. daniel -- Red Hat Virtualization group http://redhat.com/virtualization/ Daniel Veillard | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/