Re: [libvirt PATCH 0/6] Introduce Local Migration Support in Libvirt
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 10:42:48AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I am happy that Libvirt is pushing local migration/live patching support, but
at the same time I am wondering what changed from what you said here:
Err, this isn't libvirt pushing local migration. I'm simply re-posting
these patches on behalf of Shaju who is unable to post the patches due
to our broken mail server. Don't take this as meaning that I approve of
the patches. They're simply here for discussion as any other patch
proposal is.
That is largely still my view.
To give you a background, we have live patching enhancements in IBM
backlog
since a few years ago, and one on the reasons these were being postponed
time and time again were the lack of Libvirt support and this direction of
"Libvirt is not interested in supporting it". And this message above was being
used internally as the rationale for it.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|