Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 0/3] numatune: Prefer old approach

Consider the following part of domain XML: <numatune> <memory mode='static' nodeset="0,2"/> </numatune> <cpu> <numa> <cell id='0' cpus='0' memory='65536' unit='KiB'/> </numa> </cpu> Yes, this have a great potential of breaking things. Especially, this will break migration between previous two or three upstream releases and current release we are working on, because libvirt started domains in more complicated way (even if not needed). After these patches, domains will be started in simpler way which is incompatible. On the other hand, we get backward compatibility with much more releases than we are about to break. Michal Privoznik (3): numatune_conf: Expose virDomainNumatuneNodeSpecified qemuxml2argvtest: Fake response from numad qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr: Report backend requirement more appropriately