Did this problem get fixed while I was away?
What I'm seeing in Veerendra's valgrind log are the following suspicious
messages, although the line numbers don't correspond to the earlier line
numbers from gdb:
==17508== Invalid read of size 8
==17508== at 0x4C5D0BB: doRemoteOpen (remote_internal.c:323)
==17508== by 0x4C5EABB: remoteNetworkOpen (remote_internal.c:2392)
==17508== by 0x4C395DA: do_open (libvirt.c:447)
==17508== by 0x40A80D: main (virsh.c:4507)
if (uri->user) {
username = strdup (uri->user); <--- line 323
if (!username) goto out_of_memory;
}
==17508== Invalid write of size 8
==17508== at 0x4C5D455: doRemoteOpen (remote_internal.c:761)
==17508== by 0x4C5EABB: remoteNetworkOpen (remote_internal.c:2392)
==17508== by 0x4C395DA: do_open (libvirt.c:447)
==17508== by 0x40A80D: main (virsh.c:4507)
if (query_out) *query_out = NULL; <-- line 761
As I understand the valgrind message, these indicate that the memory
being read/written is not valid (ie. outside any allocated malloc block
or static memory), although I don't understand how those lines could
generate that error.
(FWIW this is not a core dump that I've ever seen from virsh, but I will
have a go at seeing if I can reproduce this on my RHEL 5 box later).
Rich.
--
Emerging Technologies, Red Hat -
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/
Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod
Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in
England and Wales under Company Registration No. 03798903