On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Osier Yang <jyang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
Not sure if you planned to request separate projects for these, but I don't
think it's deserved for separate projects. They can be just one project,
as the work need to do for them is similar.
Sure, they are a whole project for GSOC 2013 but separate ones.
And not restricted to storage stuffs, if renaming API makes sense for
storage
volume, it makes sense for all other objects too, e.g.
domain/network/interface/
nwfilter/secret/pool.
What I'm thinking about is, the renaming is easy to implement for inactive
objects, but for active ones, it's hard, even not possible, such as for a
active domain, the domain name is refered by various places, if you change
that, it will produce a big mess.
Maybe i will have a try for all of them ;-)
> 4, Move volume from one pool to another. I will develop 'virsh vol-move
> xxx'
> option for virsh tool.
Not sure it's deserved, the existing command create-vol-as/vol-clone can
actually copy the volume from another pool. And after that, you can just
remove the original volume. Perhaps having a virsh command to wrapper
the the two APIs together is enough.
Maybe we should have this virsh command to move volume from one pool
to another one directly.
--
Thanks
Harry Wei