Re: [libvirt] Mac Port of Libvirt
On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 11:43:41AM -0700, Yushu Yao wrote:
Thanks Daniel,
> Now support for local virtualization (QEmu for example) would be a more
> complex issue but probably not much more complex than existing linux
> hypervisor support.
Why is this more complex? Could you please explain a bit more?
Because that's code which would have to be designed/ported, instead of
just recompiling completely generic code which has already been ported
to Windows.
By the way, with libvirt, can I control a hypervisor without the
libvirtd
running with root privilege (or even without libvirtd running at all?)?
You should not assume this is possible.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/