On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 12:10:03PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 5/23/23 19:31, Cole Robinson wrote:
> numad is removed from Fedora 39. Upstream is dead
>
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numad/c/a6bb891e8447e3b2a4c63774da94ad...
>
https://pagure.io/releng/failed-composes/issue/4990#comment-857670
>
> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
> ---
>
> This powers vcpu and numatune placement='auto'. Anyone know if that's
> being actively used in kubevirt, openstack, etc?
>
> libvirt.spec.in | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libvirt.spec.in b/libvirt.spec.in
> index 1f77cd90b7..5f267a086b 100644
> --- a/libvirt.spec.in
> +++ b/libvirt.spec.in
> @@ -173,6 +173,10 @@
> %define with_numad 0%{!?_without_numad:1}
> %endif
> %endif
> +%if 0%{?fedora} >= 39
> + # numad is retired in fedora 39+, upstream is dead
> + %define with_numad 0
> +%endif
Actually, it was just added back:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11445
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/numad/c/e0d0e47bbdabc8d915a61796e2e027...
So maybe we will need to revert this? Or we may pretend that we never
saw that and just carry on. I doubt numad had any users (I mean, from
libvirt users group).
I have never seen your e-mail that mentions this. Yes, I'm talking
about the one I am replying to right here. That e-mail never existed.
Michal