4 Aug
2016
4 Aug
'16
11:11 a.m.
On Mon, 2016-08-01 at 10:02 -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
2) To assure that the actual device presented to the guest doesn't change in the future when defaults are changed, we may want to autofill "version" even when none is specified. (We would of course be stuck with the unfortunate problem of what to do with existing configs)
I don't think we should worry too much about this: since we lock on a versioned machine type on guest creation, and we can assume the default virtio version will only change along with a bump in machine type version[1], we'll always present the same hardware to the guest. [1] What would be the point in versioned machine types otherwise? :) -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization