On 10/02/16 11:37, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The function, like others in our code, returns zero on success
and a negative value on error. However, there are two places in
xenconfig source code where we check for non-zero value. While
the function can't currently return a positive value, those
checks look okay, but does not really follow our style.
s/does/do/
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/xenconfig/xen_sxpr.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/xenconfig/xen_sxpr.c b/src/xenconfig/xen_sxpr.c
index 252a48b..fdfec2b 100644
--- a/src/xenconfig/xen_sxpr.c
+++ b/src/xenconfig/xen_sxpr.c
@@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ xenParseSxprGraphicsOld(virDomainDefPtr def,
graphics->data.vnc.port = port;
if (listenAddr &&
- virDomainGraphicsListenSetAddress(graphics, 0, listenAddr, -1, true))
+ virDomainGraphicsListenSetAddress(graphics, 0, listenAddr, -1, true) <
0)
goto error;
if (VIR_STRDUP(graphics->data.vnc.auth.passwd, vncPasswd) < 0)
@@ -987,7 +987,7 @@ xenParseSxprGraphicsNew(virDomainDefPtr def,
graphics->data.vnc.port = port;
if (listenAddr &&
- virDomainGraphicsListenSetAddress(graphics, 0, listenAddr, -1,
true))
+ virDomainGraphicsListenSetAddress(graphics, 0, listenAddr, -1, true)
< 0)
goto error;
if (VIR_STRDUP(graphics->data.vnc.auth.passwd, vncPasswd) < 0)
ACK
Erik