Re: [libvirt] persistent virtual networks
Quoting Gene Czarcinski (gene(a)czarc.net):
I seem to remember that, if you use net-define, the network will be
persistent and, if you use net-create, the network will not be
persistent.
I am now running libvirt-1.0.2 on Fedora 18.
When I use net-define a network from a template and then do a
net-list --all, the network is NOT marked as persistent. If I
restart libvirtd.service, then the defined networks are persistent.
I noticed that the libvirt-1.0.2 announcement included:
- network: bridge: Fix regression when defining persistent networks
(Peter Krempa)
Do I have a bug to report?
Sounds like it, though I can confirm that the commit you cite above
fixed it for me, and 1.0.2 does the right thing here.
-serge