Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:01:00AM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>
>> Given that Xen has a decent paravirt reboot facility I'd probably
>> just not bother with trying to fake the controlled reboot via ACPI.
>>
>>
> Ok, that sounds reasonable to me. I'll drop this patch when pushing the
> others, post 1.2.4. Should 1/3 retain the VIR_DOMAIN_REBOOT_PARAVIRT
> addition tovirDomainRebootFlagValues?
>
I don't think you need to drop the patch/code. It is still useful, IMHO,
to have the explicit flag for VIR_DOMAIN_REBOOT_PARAVIRT. I'd just
suggest you remove the block of code for VIR_DOMAIN_REBOOT_ACPI_POWER_BTN
impl in the reboot method.
Just to clarify, do you mean changing this patch to the attached one?
Regards,
Jim