On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 08:06:04AM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 16:23:53 -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:59:38PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
[...]
> > Would you restrict the combinations to cut down the test
matrix - e.g.
> > not allow Haswell-3.0.0 on anything prior to a 2.12 machine type?
>
> Not sure if it would be worth the extra complexity: we would need
> an interface to tell libvirt which CPU models are usable on which
> machine-types.
In case we do this, libvirt should already by ready for it on the API
level for both reporting capabilities and CPU comparison/baseline. All
these APIs already accept machine type as an optional parameter so that
different results can be provided depending on machine type.
Does it have an abstraction that can already represent "CPU model
$C can/can't be used with machine-type $M"?
--
Eduardo