Re: Libvirt Rust bindings could use some work
On a Monday in 2022, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Wim de With wrote:
Licensing is a pretty fun minefield :)
For example, even though libvirt-rs itself would be statically linked
into any application that uses it, by virtue of it being a wrapper
around the C library you'd still end up dynamically linking against
that.
I tend to agree that language bindings should follow the rest of the
language ecosystem in terms of licensing, and for libvirt-rs
specifically that would probably mean MIT. Perhaps we should consider
looking into relicensing the project?
Alternatively, stay away from "ecosystems" that are not compatible with
copyleft.
Jano
Attachments:
- signature.asc (application/pgp-signature — 488 bytes)