Re: [libvirt] [RFC 5/5]: Rewrite findLuns function
Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> Who told you/anyone who wrote this code before that the 0th
lun cannot
>> be a real entry? This assumption is wrong.
> Well, that particular piece of code isn't looking at the 0'th LUN, but there
is
> code below that that is. However, the code here is generally looking for block
> devices, and the 0'th LUN is definitely not a block device. Given that, I'm
not
> sure what else you would want to do with 0th LUN; can you give me some examples?
The 0th LUN can be a perfect block device.
OK, cool, I misunderstood. Given that, can you give me the output of:
# ls -l /sys/bus/scsi/devices/3:0:0:0
Just to make sure I get the right thing?
Thanks,
Chris Lalancette