On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 09:32:13AM -0400, Mark Johnson wrote:
As johnlev said, I can fix the limits_iso.h with limits.h
><string.h> is in ISO C, but <strings.h> is not. So as Daniel Veillard
>said you can include the former without checks, but the latter should be
>defended with an #ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H.
>
>On BSD, <strings.h> has the legacy functions like bcopy and index. Are
>we using those? Shouldn't we instead replace any instances with memcpy
>/ memmove / strchr / strrchr?
It's needed because of index().
please use strchr() let's get rid of strings.h , that will be way simpler.
Daniel
--
Red Hat Virtualization group
http://redhat.com/virtualization/
Daniel Veillard | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/
veillard(a)redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/