On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:42:01PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Jim Meyering wrote:
>Any objection to a mass removal of trailing blanks?
>
>[ If you haven't yet been adversely affected by e.g., pointless conflicts
> due solely to differences in white space, count yourself lucky, and
> chalk it up to not having to deal with many branches.
> The sooner we do this the better, IME. ]
>
>I'm proposing two things:
> - remove all trailing blanks
> - add a "make syntax-check" check to ensure that no new ones are added
Yup, no problems with such a patch.
Interestingly emacs perl-mode highlights trailing spaces.
I looked into it, and there is a show-trailing-whitespace variable in
emacs, so one might consider modifying our "standard" trailer to be:
/*
* Local variables:
* indent-tabs-mode: nil
* c-indent-level: 4
* c-basic-offset: 4
* tab-width: 4
* show-trailing-whitespace: t <--- NB
* End:
*/
HOWEVER this doesn't work, or at least not automatically. Emacs
complains: "The local variables list in foo.c contains values that may
not be safe" and marks show-trailing-whitespace as one such variable.
Although one can mark it as safe in your local preferences, every emacs
user would have to do this.
I've no idea why show-trailing-whitespace should be unsafe.
Hmm, I've got the following in my $HOME/.emacsrc file
(require 'show-wspace)
(add-hook 'font-lock-mode-hook 'highlight-trailing-whitespace)
Which does the trick for me
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|