On 12/11/2013 08:38 PM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> Adding output to 'virsh --version=long' makes it easier to
> tell if a distro built with particular libraries (it doesn't
> tell you what a remote libvirtd is built with, but is still
> better than nothing).
>
>From a code stand point this is fine. But the commit subject and
message are ambiguous and don't really explain what you're doing. It
seems like you're adding all storage compile options into the output
when really they were there already and just Gluster was missing.
Wouldn't be better to say "storage: show gluster option in virsh
--version=long"?
Sure, that sounds nicer.
I realize I'm nitpicking the commit message/subject, the code is fine
so ACK from that stand point.
Amended and pushed
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org