On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 06:32:41PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
if (mgr == NULL || mgr->drv == NULL)
return ret;
This check isn't really necessary, security manager cannot be a NULL
pointer as it is either selinux (by default) or 'none', if no other driver is
set in the config. Even with no config file driver name yields 'none'.
The other hunk checks for domain's security model validity, but we should
also check devices' security model as well, therefore this hunk is moved into
a separate function which is called by virSecurityManagerCheckAllLabel that
checks both the domain's security model and devices' security model.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165485
---
src/security/security_manager.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
ACK
@@ -731,6 +713,22 @@ static int
virSecurityManagerCheckSecurityModel(char *secmodel,
static int
+virSecurityManagerCheckSecurityDomainLabel(virDomainDefPtr def,
+ void *opaque)
Same comments as for v1 regarding the use of void and the repeating
extra word.
@@ -776,6 +774,11 @@ int
virSecurityManagerCheckAllLabel(virSecurityManagerPtr mgr,
{
size_t i;
+ /* first check per-domain seclabels */
These comments don't seem very helpful - a function named
CheckDomainLabel should do exactly that.
I fixed the nits and pushed the patch.
Jan