Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 3/3] Do proper escaping of cgroup resource partitions

On 04/26/2013 04:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; > > If a user cgroup name begins with "cgroup.", "_" or with any of > the controllers from /proc/cgroups followed by a dot, then they > need to be prefixed with a single underscore. eg if there is > an object "cpu.service", then this would end up as "_cpu.service" > in the cgroup filesystem tree, however, "waldo.service" would > stay "waldo.service", at least as long as nobody comes up with > a cgroup controller called "waldo". Do we also need to consider cgroup names beginning with leading '.'?

> I didn't closely inspect the test; but at least the fact that it is there gives us reassurance that the change is right.