June 2025 - Devel - libvirt List Archives

[PATCH 0/6] Various fixes and cleanups
by Peter Krempa 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

A collection of random one-off fixes for issues where the root cause was analyzed by the reporter and cleanups that I've recently accumulated. Peter Krempa (6): storage_file_probe: Use named initializer for 'struct FileTypeInfo' virQEMUCapsFindBinary: Refactor local variables virshPrintJobProgress: Don't rewrite migration status line on non-terminals storage: parthelper: Use if/else instead of ternary operator storage: disk: Properly handle partition numbers separated by 'p' tlscert: Don't force 'keyEncipherment' for ECDSA and ECDH src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 9 +- src/rpc/virnettlscert.c | 33 +++-- src/storage/parthelper.c | 7 +- src/storage/storage_backend_disk.c | 9 +- src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c | 174 ++++++++++++++++++-------- tools/virsh-domain.c | 13 +- 6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) -- 2.49.0

4 9

Re: [PATCH v4 00/27] hw/i386/pc: Remove deprecated 2.6 and 2.7 PC machines
by Igor Mammedov 17 Jun '25

17 Jun '25

On Thu, 8 May 2025 15:35:23 +0200 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Since v3: > - Addressed Thomas and Zhao review comments > - Rename fw_cfg_init_mem_[no]dma() helpers > - Remove unused CPU properties > - Remove {multi,linux}boot.bin > - Added R-b tags > > Since v2: > - Addressed Mark review comments and added his R-b tags > > The versioned 'pc' and 'q35' machines up to 2.12 been marked > as deprecated two releases ago, and are older than 6 years, > so according to our support policy we can remove them. > > This series only includes the 2.6 and 2.7 machines removal, > as it is a big enough number of LoC removed. Rest will > follow. CCing libvirt folks series removes some properties that has been used as compat knobs with 2.6/2.7 machine types that are being removed. However libvirt might still use them, please check if being removed properties are safe to remove as is | should be deprecated 1st | should be left alone from an immediate user perspective. > > Based-on: <20250506143905.4961-1-philmd(a)linaro.org> > [...]

5 4

SEO website
by nokores231＠finfave.com 16 Jun '25

16 Jun '25

SEO website brings you the best free porn in incredible quality and variety for your satisfaction. The web is very useful if you are looking for lesbian porn, Asian porn, or beautiful Indian girls. It is a website that has a lot of potentials and that you should visit to enjoy the best porn online. https://www.freebestpost.com/escorts/assortlist-com~2022_02~15

1 0

escorts services
by mahom90637＠nab4.com 15 Jun '25

15 Jun '25

The top rated escort sites allow you to contact the girl that suits your needs. That is to say, you will be able to call the prostitutes that you consider to be the most beautiful, sensual, or simply cheap. https://www.canadaescorts.ca

1 0

[PATCH v4 0/5] Disable Deprecated Features by Default on s390 CPU Models
by Collin Walling 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

Changelog v4 - added qemu.conf option to dictate the default behavior for the deprecated_features attribute (Boris) - added qemuxmlactivetests (Boris) - snuck in missing documentation for deprecated_features in formatdomain.rst v3 - added qemu caps check to avoid breaking s390 guests trying to default deprecated_features='off' on QEMU versions that do not support reporting these features v2 - changed behavior from disabling features on the host model to instead flagging the guest CPU to disable deprecated features - removed disabling deprecated features on host model in virQEMUCapsInitCPUModelS390 - added flagging deprecated_feats in qemuProcessUpdateGuestCPU - added tests for deprecated_features='on' - split virQEMUCapsUpdateCPUDeprecatedFeatures update and qemuProcessUpdateGuestCPU changes The intention of reporting deprecated features and modifying the guest CPU model was to alleviate the user from the burden of preparing a guest with the necessary amendments to assure migration to newer hardware. While that goal was met by way of the "deprecated_features='on|off'" attribute, it still adds an extra step that the user must be aware to prepare a guest for migration and the errors that stem from an unsuccessful migration (due to feature incompatibility) is not always clear how to resolve. These patches make s390 CPU *host models* migration ready from the get-go by introducing a qemu.conf option for disabling deprecated features by default. They may still be disabled for other model types via the respective attribute, or reenabled if desired. The configured behavior may be overridden by explicitly providing the attribute within the guest XML. Boris Fiuczynski (1): tests: new qemuxmlactive tests for s390x Collin Walling (4): docs: domain: document deprecated_features attribute qemu: caps: add virCPUFeaturePolicy param to virQEMUCapsUpdateCPUDeprecatedFeatures qemu: process: refactor deprecated features code qemu: add default_cpu_deprecated_features configuration option docs/formatdomain.rst | 8 ++++ src/qemu/libvirtd_qemu.aug | 3 ++ src/qemu/qemu.conf.in | 14 ++++++ src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 6 +-- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 +- src/qemu/qemu_conf.c | 33 +++++++++++++ src/qemu/qemu_conf.h | 12 +++++ src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 3 +- src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 46 +++++++++++++++---- src/qemu/test_libvirtd_qemu.aug.in | 1 + ...ated-features-none-active.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ ...ed-features-none-inactive.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ ...cated-features-off-active.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ ...ted-features-off-inactive.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ ...ecated-features-on-active.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ ...ated-features-on-inactive.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ tests/qemuxmlactivetest.c | 11 ++++- ...deprecated-features-none.s390x-latest.args | 32 +++++++++++++ ...-deprecated-features-none.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ .../cpu-model-deprecated-features-none.xml | 15 ++++++ ...l-deprecated-features-on.s390x-latest.args | 32 +++++++++++++ ...el-deprecated-features-on.s390x-latest.xml | 25 ++++++++++ .../cpu-model-deprecated-features-on.xml | 15 ++++++ ...default-video-type-s390x.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- ...vfio-zpci-ccw-memballoon.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- .../launch-security-s390-pv.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- ...t-cpu-kvm-ccw-virtio-4.2.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- .../s390-defaultconsole.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- .../s390-panic.s390x-latest.args | 2 +- tests/qemuxmlconftest.c | 2 + 30 files changed, 426 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-none-active.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-none-inactive.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-off-active.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-off-inactive.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-on-active.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlactive2xmldata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-on-inactive.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-none.s390x-latest.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-none.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-none.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-on.s390x-latest.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-on.s390x-latest.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/cpu-model-deprecated-features-on.xml -- 2.47.1

1 5

[PATCH v3 0/3] CH: Add support for a configuration file and log level configuration
by Stefan Kober 13 Jun '25

13 Jun '25

Similar to the qemu.conf file that allows QEMU specific configurations we add the possibility to specify a ch.conf file for Cloud Hypervisor configuration. The initial single config option is the log level, which sets the verbosity of the Cloud Hypervisor process. This allows for simpler debugging when using Cloud Hypervisor via libvirt. Stefan Kober (3): ch: Add config file support ch: add log level configuration option NEWS: ch: announce log_level config option NEWS.rst | 5 +++++ src/ch/ch.conf | 11 ++++++++++ src/ch/ch_conf.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/ch/ch_conf.h | 18 +++++++++++++++ src/ch/ch_driver.c | 6 +++++ src/ch/ch_monitor.c | 6 +++++ src/ch/libvirtd_ch.aug | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/ch/meson.build | 12 ++++++++++ src/ch/test_libvirtd_ch.aug.in | 5 +++++ 9 files changed, 134 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/ch/ch.conf create mode 100644 src/ch/libvirtd_ch.aug create mode 100644 src/ch/test_libvirtd_ch.aug.in -- 2.49.0

2 4

[PATCH 0/3] qemu: Replace usb-storage with usb-bot
by Akihiko Odaki 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

usb-storage is a compound device that automatically creates a USB mass storage device and a SCSI device as its backend. Unfortunately it lacks some configuration options that are usually present with a SCSI device, and cannot represent CD-ROM in particular. Replace usb-storage with usb-bot, which can be combined with a manually created SCSI device. libvirt will configure the SCSI device in a way identical with how QEMU does for usb-storage except that now it respects a configuration option to represent CD-ROM. Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/368 Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com> --- Akihiko Odaki (3): qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_BOT qemu: Replace usb-storage with usb-bot qemu_capabilities: Retire QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_USB_STORAGE src/qemu/qemu_alias.c | 3 +- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 19 +- src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 3 +- src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 55 +++++- src/qemu/qemu_command.h | 5 + src/qemu/qemu_hotplug.c | 34 +++- src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 4 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_10.0.0_s390x.replies | 186 ++++--------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_10.0.0_s390x.xml | 2 +- .../caps_10.0.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_10.0.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_5.2.0_aarch64.replies | 174 ++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_aarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_ppc64.replies | 178 +++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_ppc64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_5.2.0_riscv64.replies | 170 ++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_riscv64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_x86_64.replies | 190 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_5.2.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_6.0.0_aarch64.replies | 172 ++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0_aarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0_x86_64.replies | 188 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.0.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.1.0_x86_64.replies | 194 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.1.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_6.2.0_aarch64.replies | 178 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.2.0_aarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.2.0_ppc64.replies | 182 +++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.2.0_ppc64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.2.0_x86_64.replies | 194 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_6.2.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_7.0.0_aarch64+hvf.replies | 182 +++++------------- .../caps_7.0.0_aarch64+hvf.xml | 2 +- .../caps_7.0.0_aarch64.replies | 182 +++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.0.0_aarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.0.0_ppc64.replies | 182 +++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.0.0_ppc64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.0.0_x86_64.replies | 194 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.0.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.1.0_ppc64.replies | 182 +++++------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.1.0_ppc64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.1.0_x86_64.replies | 194 +++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.1.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.2.0_ppc.replies | 186 ++++--------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.2.0_ppc.xml | 2 +- .../caps_7.2.0_x86_64+hvf.replies | 206 +++++---------------- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.2.0_x86_64+hvf.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.2.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_7.2.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_8.0.0_riscv64.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.0.0_riscv64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.0.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.0.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.1.0_s390x.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.1.0_s390x.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.1.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.1.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_8.2.0_aarch64.replies | 190 ++++--------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_aarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_armv7l.replies | 190 ++++--------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_armv7l.xml | 2 +- .../caps_8.2.0_loongarch64.replies | 186 ++++--------------- .../caps_8.2.0_loongarch64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_s390x.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_s390x.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_8.2.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.0.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.0.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../caps_9.1.0_riscv64.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_riscv64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_s390x.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_s390x.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.1.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_s390x.replies | 182 ++++-------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_s390x.xml | 2 +- .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_x86_64.replies | 206 +++++---------------- tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_x86_64.xml | 2 +- tests/qemuhotplugtest.c | 8 +- .../qemuxmlconfdata/disk-cache.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +- .../disk-cdrom-bus-other.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +- .../disk-device-removable.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +- .../disk-usb-device.x86_64-latest.args | 3 +- 84 files changed, 1689 insertions(+), 5346 deletions(-) --- base-commit: e5299ddf86121d3c792ca271ffcb54900eb19dc3 change-id: 20250304-bot-5d84aa3a5cfe Best regards, -- Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com>

4 11

[PATCH 0/2] esx: Allow specifying different CA bundle for remote connections
by Martin Kletzander 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

**El Blurbo aquí** Martin Kletzander (2): esx: Allow specifying different CA bundle for remote connections NEWS: Mention cainfo_path parameter in esx driver NEWS.rst | 5 +++++ docs/drvesx.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++-- src/esx/esx_util.c | 4 ++++ src/esx/esx_util.h | 1 + src/esx/esx_vi.c | 3 +++ 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.49.0

2 6

[PATCH] storage: Implement a simple 'checkPool' method for 'rbd' type pools
by Krisstoffe 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

From: Krisstoffe <krisstoffe(a)free.fr> Resolves: https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/448 Signed-off-by: Krisstoffe <krisstoffe(a)free.fr> --- src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c index 038a1a9e34..29d544d349 100644 --- a/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c +++ b/src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c @@ -1442,9 +1442,21 @@ virStorageBackendRBDVolWipe(virStoragePoolObj *pool, } +static int +virStorageBackendRBDCheckPool(virStoragePoolObj *pool, + bool *active) +{ + /* Return previous state remembered by the status XML. If the pool is not + * available we will fail to refresh it and end up in the same situation. */ + *active = virStoragePoolObjIsActive(pool); + return 0; +} + + virStorageBackend virStorageBackendRBD = { .type = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_RBD, + .checkPool = virStorageBackendRBDCheckPool, .refreshPool = virStorageBackendRBDRefreshPool, .createVol = virStorageBackendRBDCreateVol, .buildVol = virStorageBackendRBDBuildVol, -- 2.47.1

2 1

[RFC PATCH v4 0/4] RFC: Add Arm CCA support for getting capability information and running Realm VM
by Kazuhiro Abe 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

Hi, all. This patch adds Arm CCA support to QEMU driver for aarch64 system. CCA is an abbreviation for Arm Confidential Compute Architecture feature, it enhances the virtualization capabilities of the platform by separating the management of resources from access to those resources. We are not yet at the stage where we can merge this patch as host Linux/QEMU support is not yet merged, but I would like to receive reviews and comments on the overall direction. Changes in v4: - Changed the target QEMU binary (Linaro's CCA/v8 version with added QMP functionality) - Added the 'armrme' variant to tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/README.rst. - Renamed data files to include '+armrme': - tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0-virt.aarch64+armrme.xml - tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0.aarch64+armrme.xml - tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.replies - tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.xml - tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.args - tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.xml - Reorganized the commits to ensure the tests pass even with partial application of the patch. [summary] At this stage, all you can do is getting the CCA capability with the virsh domcapabilities command and start the CCA VM with the virsh create command. capability info uses QEMU QMP to query QEMU options. The option that exists now is for selecting a hash algorithm. QEMU QMP sections currently only contains a single member, but is wrapped in sections for expansion. [Capability example] Execution results of 'virsh domcapability" on QEMU <domaincapabilities> ... <features> ... </sgx> <cca supported='yes'> <enum name='measurement-algo'> <value>sha256</value> <value>sha512</value> </enum> </cca> <hyperv supported='yes'> ... </features> </domaincapabilities> [XML example] <domain> ... <launchsecurity type='cca'> <measurement-algo>sha256</measurement-algo> </launchsecurity> ... </domain> [limitations/tests] To obtain capability info, it is necessary to support the QEMU QMP command, which QEMU does not yet support. We added a QMP command to retrieve CCA info for test (See "[software version]" below). I need to check qemu_firmware.c to see if my CPU firmware supports CCA. Since it's not implemented yet, I'll wait until a Linux distributor provides me with a JSON file for CCA. We have confirmed that the added tests (qemucapabilitiestest, domaincapstest and qemuxmlconftest) and the CCA VM startup test (starting the CCA VM from the virsh create command) passed. The "personalization-value" and "measurement-log" parameters that exist in the current Linaro QEMU cca/latest branch will not be specified as CCA VM startup parameters with the virsh create command. [software version] I followed the steps in Linaro's blog below. https://linaro.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/QEMU/pages/29051027459/Building+an… The QEMU used was enhanced with CCA QMP command and found at: https://github.com/Kazuhiro-Abe-fj/linaro_qemu/tree/cca-latest-qmp which is based on Linaro QEMU (cca/latest) https://git.codelinaro.org/linaro/dcap/qemu/-/tree/cca/latest?ref_type=heads RFC v1: https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/V4S5… RFC v2: https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/message/5VZ… RFC v3: https://lists.libvirt.org/archives/list/devel@lists.libvirt.org/thread/LLWA… Signed-off-by: Kazuhiro Abe fj1078ii(a)aa.jp.fujitsu.com Akio Kakuno (3): src: Add ARM CCA support in qemu driver to launch VM src: Add ARM CCA support in domain capabilities command src: Add ARM CCA support in domain schema Kazuhiro Abe (1): tests: Adds Arm CCA support docs/formatdomain.rst | 43 + docs/formatdomaincaps.rst | 27 +- src/conf/domain_capabilities.c | 48 + src/conf/domain_capabilities.h | 12 + src/conf/domain_conf.c | 25 + src/conf/domain_conf.h | 9 + src/conf/domain_validate.c | 1 + src/conf/schemas/domaincaps.rng | 36 + src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 26 + src/conf/virconftypes.h | 2 + src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 + src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.c | 145 + src/qemu/qemu_capabilities.h | 4 + src/qemu/qemu_cgroup.c | 2 + src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 29 + src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 2 + src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c | 1 + src/qemu/qemu_monitor.c | 10 + src/qemu/qemu_monitor.h | 3 + src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.c | 98 + src/qemu/qemu_monitor_json.h | 4 + src/qemu/qemu_namespace.c | 2 + src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 4 + src/qemu/qemu_validate.c | 4 + src/security/security_dac.c | 2 + .../qemu_9.2.0-virt.aarch64+armrme.xml | 244 + .../qemu_9.2.0.aarch64+armrme.xml | 244 + tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/README.rst | 5 + .../caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.replies | 36754 ++++++++++++++++ .../caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.xml | 540 + ...ch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.args | 30 + ...nch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.xml | 24 + tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.xml | 16 + tests/qemuxmlconftest.c | 2 + 34 files changed, 38398 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0-virt.aarch64+armrme.xml create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsdata/qemu_9.2.0.aarch64+armrme.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.replies create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_9.2.0_aarch64+armrme.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.aarch64-latest+armrme.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxmlconfdata/launch-security-cca.xml -- 2.43.5

1 4