Re: [libvirt] [Qemu-devel] Qemu migration with vhost-user-blk on top of local storage
by Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 06:23:42PM +0800, wuzhouhui wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm working qemu with vhost target (e.g. spdk), and I attempt to migrate VM with
> 2 local storages. One local storage is a regular file, e.g. /tmp/c74.qcow2, and
> the other is a malloc bdev that spdk created. This malloc bdev will exported to
> VM via vhost-user-blk. When I execute following command:
>
> virsh migrate --live --persistent --unsafe --undefinesource --copy-storage-all \
> --p2p --auto-converge --verbose --desturi qemu+tcp://<uri>/system vm0
>
> The libvirt reports:
>
> qemu-2.12.1: error: internal error: unable to execute QEMU command \
> 'nbd-server-add': Cannot find device=drive-virtio-disk1 nor \
> node_name=drive-virtio-disk1
Please post your libvirt domain XML.
> Does it means that qemu with spdk on top of local storage don't support migration?
>
> QEMU: 2.12.1
> SPDK: 18.10
vhost-user-blk bypasses the QEMU block layer, so NBD storage migration
at the QEMU level will not work for the vhost-user-blk disk.
Stefan
1 year, 1 month
[libvirt] [PATCH v3] openvswitch: Add new port VLAN mode "dot1q-tunnel"
by luzhipeng＠uniudc.com
From: ZhiPeng Lu <luzhipeng(a)uniudc.com>
Signed-off-by: ZhiPeng Lu <luzhipeng(a)uniudc.com>
---
v1->v2:
1. Fix "make syntax-check" failure
v2->v3:
1. remove other_config when updating vlan
docs/formatnetwork.html.in | 17 +++++++++--------
docs/schemas/networkcommon.rng | 1 +
src/conf/netdev_vlan_conf.c | 2 +-
src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c | 7 +++++++
src/util/virnetdevvlan.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/formatnetwork.html.in b/docs/formatnetwork.html.in
index 363a72b..3c1ae62 100644
--- a/docs/formatnetwork.html.in
+++ b/docs/formatnetwork.html.in
@@ -688,16 +688,17 @@
</p>
<p>
For network connections using Open vSwitch it is also possible
- to configure 'native-tagged' and 'native-untagged' VLAN modes
+ to configure 'native-tagged' and 'native-untagged' and 'dot1q-tunnel'
+ VLAN modes.
<span class="since">Since 1.1.0.</span> This is done with the
- optional <code>nativeMode</code> attribute on
- the <code><tag></code> subelement: <code>nativeMode</code>
- may be set to 'tagged' or 'untagged'. The <code>id</code>
- attribute of the <code><tag></code> subelement
- containing <code>nativeMode</code> sets which VLAN is considered
- to be the "native" VLAN for this interface, and
+ optional <code>nativeMode</code> attribute on the
+ <code><tag></code> subelement: <code>nativeMode</code>
+ may be set to 'tagged' or 'untagged' or 'dot1q-tunnel'.
+ The <code>id</code> attribute of the <code><tag></code>
+ subelement containing <code>nativeMode</code> sets which VLAN is
+ considered to be the "native" VLAN for this interface, and
the <code>nativeMode</code> attribute determines whether or not
- traffic for that VLAN will be tagged.
+ traffic for that VLAN will be tagged or QinQ.
</p>
<p>
<code><vlan></code> elements can also be specified in
diff --git a/docs/schemas/networkcommon.rng b/docs/schemas/networkcommon.rng
index 2699555..11c48ff 100644
--- a/docs/schemas/networkcommon.rng
+++ b/docs/schemas/networkcommon.rng
@@ -223,6 +223,7 @@
<choice>
<value>tagged</value>
<value>untagged</value>
+ <value>dot1q-tunnel</value>
</choice>
</attribute>
</optional>
diff --git a/src/conf/netdev_vlan_conf.c b/src/conf/netdev_vlan_conf.c
index dff49c6..79710d9 100644
--- a/src/conf/netdev_vlan_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/netdev_vlan_conf.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
VIR_ENUM_IMPL(virNativeVlanMode, VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_LAST,
- "default", "tagged", "untagged")
+ "default", "tagged", "untagged", "dot1q-tunnel")
int
virNetDevVlanParse(xmlNodePtr node, xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt, virNetDevVlanPtr def)
diff --git a/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c b/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
index 8fe06fd..9fec30b 100644
--- a/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
+++ b/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
@@ -91,6 +91,11 @@ virNetDevOpenvswitchConstructVlans(virCommandPtr cmd, virNetDevVlanPtr virtVlan)
virCommandAddArg(cmd, "vlan_mode=native-untagged");
virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "tag=%d", virtVlan->nativeTag);
break;
+ case VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_DOT1Q_TUNNEL:
+ virCommandAddArg(cmd, "vlan_mode=dot1q-tunnel");
+ virCommandAddArg(cmd, "other_config:qinq-ethtype=802.1q");
+ virCommandAddArgFormat(cmd, "tag=%d", virtVlan->nativeTag);
+ break;
case VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_DEFAULT:
default:
break;
@@ -504,6 +509,8 @@ int virNetDevOpenvswitchUpdateVlan(const char *ifname,
"--", "--if-exists", "clear", "Port", ifname, "tag",
"--", "--if-exists", "clear", "Port", ifname, "trunk",
"--", "--if-exists", "clear", "Port", ifname, "vlan_mode",
+ "--", "--if-exists", "remove", "Port", ifname, "other_config",
+ "qinq-ethtype", NULL,
"--", "--if-exists", "set", "Port", ifname, NULL);
if (virNetDevOpenvswitchConstructVlans(cmd, virtVlan) < 0)
diff --git a/src/util/virnetdevvlan.h b/src/util/virnetdevvlan.h
index be85f59..0667f9d 100644
--- a/src/util/virnetdevvlan.h
+++ b/src/util/virnetdevvlan.h
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum {
VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_DEFAULT = 0,
VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_TAGGED,
VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_UNTAGGED,
+ VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_DOT1Q_TUNNEL,
VIR_NATIVE_VLAN_MODE_LAST
} virNativeVlanMode;
--
1.8.3.1
1 year, 1 month
[libvirt] [PATCH] Fix compile error for stable 1.2.9
by Yang hongyang
Seems a backport miss. An extra member is passed to struct
virLXCBasicMountInfo.
Signed-off-by: Yang hongyang <hongyang.yang(a)easystack.cn>
---
src/lxc/lxc_container.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_container.c b/src/lxc/lxc_container.c
index 28dabec..1c65fa9 100644
--- a/src/lxc/lxc_container.c
+++ b/src/lxc/lxc_container.c
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ typedef struct {
static const virLXCBasicMountInfo lxcBasicMounts[] = {
{ "proc", "/proc", "proc", MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV, false, false },
- { "/proc/sys", "/proc/sys", NULL, MS_BIND|MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV|MS_RDONLY, false, false, false },
+ { "/proc/sys", "/proc/sys", NULL, MS_BIND|MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV|MS_RDONLY, false, false },
{ "sysfs", "/sys", "sysfs", MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV|MS_RDONLY, false, false },
{ "securityfs", "/sys/kernel/security", "securityfs", MS_NOSUID|MS_NOEXEC|MS_NODEV|MS_RDONLY, true, true },
#if WITH_SELINUX
--
1.7.1
1 year, 1 month
[libvirt] Supporting vhost-net and macvtap in libvirt for QEMU
by Anthony Liguori
Disclaimer: I am neither an SR-IOV nor a vhost-net expert, but I've CC'd
people that are who can throw tomatoes at me for getting bits wrong :-)
I wanted to start a discussion about supporting vhost-net in libvirt.
vhost-net has not yet been merged into qemu but I expect it will be soon
so it's a good time to start this discussion.
There are two modes worth supporting for vhost-net in libvirt. The
first mode is where vhost-net backs to a tun/tap device. This is
behaves in very much the same way that -net tap behaves in qemu today.
Basically, the difference is that the virtio backend is in the kernel
instead of in qemu so there should be some performance improvement.
Current, libvirt invokes qemu with -net tap,fd=X where X is an already
open fd to a tun/tap device. I suspect that after we merge vhost-net,
libvirt could support vhost-net in this mode by just doing -net
vhost,fd=X. I think the only real question for libvirt is whether to
provide a user visible switch to use vhost or to just always use vhost
when it's available and it makes sense. Personally, I think the later
makes sense.
The more interesting invocation of vhost-net though is one where the
vhost-net device backs directly to a physical network card. In this
mode, vhost should get considerably better performance than the current
implementation. I don't know the syntax yet, but I think it's
reasonable to assume that it will look something like -net
tap,dev=eth0. The effect will be that eth0 is dedicated to the guest.
On most modern systems, there is a small number of network devices so
this model is not all that useful except when dealing with SR-IOV
adapters. In that case, each physical device can be exposed as many
virtual devices (VFs). There are a few restrictions here though. The
biggest is that currently, you can only change the number of VFs by
reloading a kernel module so it's really a parameter that must be set at
startup time.
I think there are a few ways libvirt could support vhost-net in this
second mode. The simplest would be to introduce a new tag similar to
<source network='br0'>. In fact, if you probed the device type for the
network parameter, you could probably do something like <source
network='eth0'> and have it Just Work.
Another model would be to have libvirt see an SR-IOV adapter as a
network pool whereas it handled all of the VF management. Considering
how inflexible SR-IOV is today, I'm not sure whether this is the best model.
Has anyone put any more thought into this problem or how this should be
modeled in libvirt? Michael, could you share your current thinking for
-net syntax?
--
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
1 year, 1 month
[PATCH v2 00/19] Refactoring conf to use XPath
by Kristina Hanicova
This is v2 from
https://listman.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2021-April/msg00617.html
Changes since v1:
- rebase to the lastest git master
This series reworks the outdated way of parsing XML to parsing by XPath,
which is more obvious and saves a few lines of code.
Kristina Hanicova (19):
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into
virDomainHostdevSubsysUSBDefParseXML()
Refactoring virDomainHostdevSubsysUSBDefParseXML() to use XPath
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into virDomainBlkioDeviceParseXML()
Refactoring virDomainBlkioDeviceParseXML() to use XPath
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into
virDomainHostdevSubsysPCIDefParseXML()
Refactoring virDomainHostdevSubsysPCIDefParseXML() to use XPath
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into virDomainLeaseDefParseXML()
Refactoring virDomainLeaseDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainFSDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainNetDefParseXML() to use XPath
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into
virDomainChrDefParseTargetXML()
Refactoring virDomainChrDefParseTargetXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainChrSourceDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainChrDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainSmartcardDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainGraphicsDefParseXMLSpice() to use XPath
conf: Propagate xmlXPathContextPtr into
virDomainVideoDriverDefParseXML()
Refactoring virDomainVideoDriverDefParseXML() to use XPath
Refactoring virDomainVideoDefParseXML() to use XPath
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 1641 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 707 insertions(+), 934 deletions(-)
--
2.30.2
2 years, 9 months
[libvirt PATCH] qemu_firmware: don't error out for unknown firmware features
by Pavel Hrdina
When QEMU introduces new firmware features libvirt will fail until we
list that feature in our code as well which doesn't sound right.
We should simply ignore the new feature until we add a proper support
for it.
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina(a)redhat.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c b/src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c
index 94e88ebe4b..e37a7edefa 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_firmware.c
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ qemuFirmwareFeatureParse(const char *path,
virJSONValue *featuresJSON;
g_autoptr(qemuFirmwareFeature) features = NULL;
size_t nfeatures;
+ size_t nparsed = 0;
size_t i;
if (!(featuresJSON = virJSONValueObjectGetArray(doc, "features"))) {
@@ -586,17 +587,16 @@ qemuFirmwareFeatureParse(const char *path,
int tmp;
if ((tmp = qemuFirmwareFeatureTypeFromString(tmpStr)) <= 0) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("unknown feature %s"),
- tmpStr);
- return -1;
+ VIR_DEBUG("unknown feature %s", tmpStr);
+ continue;
}
- features[i] = tmp;
+ features[nparsed] = tmp;
+ nparsed++;
}
fw->features = g_steal_pointer(&features);
- fw->nfeatures = nfeatures;
+ fw->nfeatures = nparsed;
return 0;
}
--
2.30.2
2 years, 10 months
[RFC] Allowing SEV attestation
by Michal Prívozník
Dear list,
in the light of recent development of secure virtualization (for instance AMD
SEV-SNP [1]) I'd like us to be prepared for when QEMU adopts these new
technologies and thus would like to discuss our options. So far, I've came
across AMD SEV-SNP [2]. While it's true that we do support SEV, we need to
adopt its newer version too.
Consider the following example: you loan a VM on a public cloud and you want
to process some private data there. Of course, the data has to be stored on an
encrypted disk/partition. But encrypting guest memory (confidentiality)
prevents you only from finding the key in a memory dump. It doesn't help if
the guest image, initial guest memory, hypervisor or firmware were tampered with.
This is where attestation comes to help - it enables the guest owner (which in
this example is different to the one running it) verify - with cryptographic
level of confidence - that data confidentiality and integrity can be ensured.
Depending on the technology, attestation will be done at different times in
the VM lifecycle. When it's done before starting guest vCPUs, it's called
pre-attestation and when it's done after the guest has launched, it's called
post-attestation. For example, AMD SEV and SEV-ES require pre-attestation.
SEV-SNP allows for post attestation. The crux of the issue here is that *when*
and *how* the guest owner will interact with the VM for attestation will be
different depending on which technology is being used.
It looks like QEMU will expose commands needed for attestation via QMP [3].
But question then is, how to expose those at Libvirt level? Should we allow
users to bypass Libvirt and communicate to QEMU directly or wrap those QMPs in
public APIs, or something completely different?
Will those APIs be generic enough to serve other technologies too? For
instance, given set of APIs in given order works for SEV but might not work
for Intel's TDX.
1: https://kvmforum2019.sched.com/event/Tmwl/improving-and-expanding-sev-sup...
2: https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/SEV-SNP-strengthening-vm-isolat...
3: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-02/msg03689.html
Michal
3 years, 1 month
[PATCH v2 0/3] qapi & doc: deprecate drive-backup
by Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Hi all!
See 03 commit message for details. 01-02 are preparation docs update.
v2: add a lot of documentation changes
v1 was "[PATCH] qapi: deprecate drive-backup"
Supersedes: <20210423125900.3640-1-vsementsov(a)virtuozzo.com>
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (3):
docs/block-replication: use blockdev-backup
docs/interop/bitmaps: use blockdev-backup
qapi: deprecate drive-backup
docs/block-replication.txt | 4 +-
docs/interop/bitmaps.rst | 285 +++++++++++++++++++------
docs/interop/live-block-operations.rst | 47 ++--
docs/system/deprecated.rst | 11 +
qapi/block-core.json | 5 +-
5 files changed, 263 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
--
2.29.2
3 years, 3 months
