On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:20:14 +0800, dinglimin wrote:
Please don't write all of your patch's description into the summary line
and also make sure to follow the established formatting we have for
almost all patches.
Also describe when you ran into the problem if possible.
Signed-off-by: dinglimin <dinglimin(a)cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
src/qemu/qemu_process.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
index cbfdd3bda5..e025e10873 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_process.c
@@ -8006,9 +8006,11 @@ qemuProcessKill(virDomainObj *vm, unsigned int flags)
}
if (flags & VIR_QEMU_PROCESS_KILL_NOWAIT) {
- virProcessKill(vm->pid,
+ if (virProcessKill(vm->pid,
(flags & VIR_QEMU_PROCESS_KILL_FORCE) ?
- SIGKILL : SIGTERM);
+ SIGKILL : SIGTERM) != 0) {
+ VIR_DEBUG("Failed to terminate qemu process");
+ }
Please make sure to follow the formatting of existing code. You've added
indentation but didn't fix the rest of the function parameters and the
VIR_DEBUG statement is also totally mis-indented.
return 0;
}
--
2.30.0.windows.2