On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, Ján Tomko wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:41:01PM +1100, Michael Chapman wrote:
> The close callbacks hash are keyed by a UUID-string, but
> virCloseCallbacksRun was attempting to remove them by raw UUID. This
> patch ensures the callback entries are removed by UUID-string as well.
>
> This bug could cause problems when guest migrations were abnormally aborted:
>
> # timeout --signal KILL 1 \
> virsh migrate example qemu+tls://remote/system \
> --verbose --compressed --live --auto-converge \
> --abort-on-error --unsafe --persistent \
> --undefinesource --copy-storage-all --xml example.xml
> Killed
>
> # virsh migrate example qemu+tls://remote/system \
> --verbose --compressed --live --auto-converge \
> --abort-on-error --unsafe --persistent \
> --undefinesource --copy-storage-all --xml example.xml
> error: Requested operation is not valid: domain 'example' is not being
migrated
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chapman <mike(a)very.puzzling.org>
> ---
> src/util/virclosecallbacks.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c b/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c
> index 4128057..b0a1a9e 100644
> --- a/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c
> +++ b/src/util/virclosecallbacks.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ typedef struct _virCloseCallbacksListEntry
virCloseCallbacksListEntry;
> typedef virCloseCallbacksListEntry *virCloseCallbacksListEntryPtr;
> struct _virCloseCallbacksListEntry {
> unsigned char uuid[VIR_UUID_BUFLEN];
> + char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN];
We shouldn't be storing the uuid twice.
OK.
> virCloseCallback callback;
> };
>
> @@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ virCloseCallbacksGetOne(void *payload,
>
> memcpy(data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].uuid,
> uuid, VIR_UUID_BUFLEN);
> + memcpy(data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].uuidstr,
> + uuidstr, VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN);
> data->list->entries[data->list->nentries - 1].callback =
closeDef->cb;
> }
>
> @@ -332,7 +335,7 @@ virCloseCallbacksRun(virCloseCallbacksPtr closeCallbacks,
>
> for (i = 0; i < list->nentries; i++) {
> virHashRemoveEntry(closeCallbacks->list,
> - list->entries[i].uuid);
> + list->entries[i].uuidstr);
I think the CPU time wasted by doing virUUIDFormat here again is
negligible and easier than writing a Hash function that works on
VIR_UUID buffers :)
Jan
Yeah, sounds reasonable. I'll send through a v2 patch shortly. I've also
got a few extra patches lined up, but I'll start a new series for those.
Thanks for the review!
- Michael