Hi, I have questions. I would like to know the specification of "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" in libvirt-0.6.1. "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" can not be executed to inactive domains. I think it is the specification. Is it correct ?

I would like to know whether the libvirt-community have a support plan for pinning inactive domains or not. Because "xm vcpu-pin" and "vcpu-list" can be excuted to inactive domains in Xen3.3.

Hi Daniel-san, Thank you for your reply. > virsh doesn't place any restrictions on whether those commands can > be run on inactive guests. It should just try the API regardless > and be prepared for any errors. I see. I think that I should remove the following check from xend_internal.c PinVcpu method. Because the latest Xen supports this. So, I made the patch that corrected the following problem. "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" can not be executed to inactive domains. > If XenD supports this then it should be just a matter of removing the > check from xend_internal.c PinVcpu method > > if (domain->id < 0) { > virXendError(domain->conn, VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, > _("Domain %s isn't running."), domain->name); > return(-1); > } Signed-off-by: Tomohiro Takahashi <takatom(a)jp.fujitsu.com&gt; Thanks, Tomohiro Takahashi Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 03:53:16PM +0900, Takahashi Tomohiro wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have questions. >> >> I would like to know the specification of "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh >> vcpuinfo" in libvirt-0.6.1. >> "virsh vcpupin" and "virsh vcpuinfo" can not be executed to inactive >> domains. >> I think it is the specification. >> Is it correct ? > > virsh doesn't place any restrictions on whether those commands can > be run on inactive guests. It should just try the API regardless > and be prepared for any errors. > >> I would like to know whether the libvirt-community have a support plan >> for pinning inactive domains or not. >> Because "xm vcpu-pin" and "vcpu-list" can be excuted to inactive >> domains in Xen3.3. > > If XenD supports this then it should be just a matter of removing the > check from xend_internal.c PinVcpu method > > if (domain->id < 0) { > virXendError(domain->conn, VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, > _("Domain %s isn't running."), domain->name); > return(-1); > } > > Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list