They way our VIR_ENUM_IMPL() and virXXXTypeFromString() work is that for any string that's not recognized a negative one is returned. And, since VIR_XXX_LAST is passed to VIR_ENUM_IMPL() we can be sure that all enum members are covered. Therefore, there is no way that virXXXTypeFromString() can return a value that's bigger or equal to VIR_XXX_LAST. I've noticed two places where such comparison was made, both in cmdNetworkUpdate(). Drop them. Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com&gt; --- tools/virsh-network.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/virsh-network.c b/tools/virsh-network.c index 5f574be78c..b2daf31d6b 100644 --- a/tools/virsh-network.c +++ b/tools/virsh-network.c @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ cmdNetworkUpdate(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) command = VIR_NETWORK_UPDATE_COMMAND_ADD_LAST; } else { command = virshNetworkUpdateCommandTypeFromString(commandStr); - if (command <= 0 || command >= VIR_NETWORK_UPDATE_COMMAND_LAST) { + if (command <= 0) { vshError(ctl, _("unrecognized command name '%s'"), commandStr); goto cleanup; } @@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ cmdNetworkUpdate(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) goto cleanup; section = virshNetworkSectionTypeFromString(sectionStr); - if (section <= 0 || section >= VIR_NETWORK_SECTION_LAST) { + if (section <= 0) { vshError(ctl, _("unrecognized section name '%s'"), sectionStr); goto cleanup; } -- 2.34.1