On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 10:30:18PM +0200, Matthias Bolte wrote: > No semantic change, the now explicitly set default are all zero and > that's what GCC sets unspecified struct members to. > --- >  src/conf/storage_conf.c |    3 ++- >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/conf/storage_conf.c b/src/conf/storage_conf.c > index 620744f..6467c73 100644 > --- a/src/conf/storage_conf.c > +++ b/src/conf/storage_conf.c > @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static virStoragePoolTypeInfo poolTypeInfo[] = { >      { .poolType = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS, >        .poolOptions = { >              .flags = (VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_DEVICE), > +            .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS_AUTO, >              .formatFromString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemTypeFromString, >              .formatToString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemTypeToString, >          }, > @@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ static virStoragePoolTypeInfo poolTypeInfo[] = { >        .poolOptions = { >              .flags = (VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_HOST | >                        VIR_STORAGE_POOL_SOURCE_DIR), > -            .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_FS_AUTO, > +            .defaultFormat = VIR_STORAGE_POOL_NETFS_AUTO, >              .formatFromString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemNetTypeFromString, >              .formatToString = virStoragePoolFormatFileSystemNetTypeToString, >          }, > -- > 1.6.3.3 > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list(a)redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list ACK.  Good change. Dave