On Fri, Nov 02, 2018 at 03:52:23PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
The actual type of an enum in C is implementation defined when there
are
no negative values, and thus it can be int, or uint. This is the case
of the virError* enums in libvirt, as they do not have negative values.
Hence, to avoid hitting tautological comparison errors when checking
their rage, temporarly cast the enum values to int when checking they
s/rage/range/
The patch itself is fine:
ACK.
Rich.
are not negative. The check is there to ensure the value is within
the
range of the OCaml type used to represent it.
Signed-off-by: Pino Toscano <ptoscano(a)redhat.com>
---
libvirt/libvirt_c_epilogue.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libvirt/libvirt_c_epilogue.c b/libvirt/libvirt_c_epilogue.c
index 29656a4..4e75d2f 100644
--- a/libvirt/libvirt_c_epilogue.c
+++ b/libvirt/libvirt_c_epilogue.c
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ Val_err_number (virErrorNumber code)
CAMLparam0 ();
CAMLlocal1 (rv);
- if (0 <= code && code <= MAX_VIR_CODE)
+ if (0 <= (int) code && code <= MAX_VIR_CODE)
rv = Val_int (code);
else {
rv = caml_alloc (1, 0); /* VIR_ERR_UNKNOWN (code) */
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ Val_err_domain (virErrorDomain code)
CAMLparam0 ();
CAMLlocal1 (rv);
- if (0 <= code && code <= MAX_VIR_DOMAIN)
+ if (0 <= (int) code && code <= MAX_VIR_DOMAIN)
rv = Val_int (code);
else {
rv = caml_alloc (1, 0); /* VIR_FROM_UNKNOWN (code) */
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Val_err_level (virErrorLevel code)
CAMLparam0 ();
CAMLlocal1 (rv);
- if (0 <= code && code <= MAX_VIR_LEVEL)
+ if (0 <= (int) code && code <= MAX_VIR_LEVEL)
rv = Val_int (code);
else {
rv = caml_alloc (1, 0); /* VIR_ERR_UNKNOWN_LEVEL (code) */
--
2.17.2
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog:
http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html