On 02/18/2010 03:57 PM, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:56:48AM -0500, Cole Robinson wrote:
> From: Dustin Xiong <x_k_123(a)hotmail.com>
>
> ACPI feature bit dropped: I asked internally if the -no-acpi option
> had any meaning for IA64, and was told 'probably not'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> src/qemu/qemu_conf.c | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> index 79bd1e8..f02db9c 100644
> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_conf.c
> @@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ static const struct qemu_arch_info const arch_info_hvm[] = {
> { "mipsel", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-mipsel", NULL, NULL, 0
},
> { "sparc", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-sparc", NULL, NULL, 0
},
> { "ppc", 32, NULL, "qemu-system-ppc", NULL, NULL, 0
},
> + { "itanium", 64, NULL, "qemu-system-ia64", NULL, NULL, 0
},
> };
ACK,
Thanks, pushed now.
- Cole