On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 01:40:40PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote:
From: Marcelo Cerri <mhcerri(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
With this patch libvirt tries to assign a model to a single seclabel
when model is missing. Libvirt will look up at host's capabilities and
assign the first model to seclabel.
This patch fixes:
1. The problem with existing guests that have a seclabel defined in its XML.
2. A XML parse error when a guest is restored.
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Cerri <mhcerri(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 554298d..5d2de72 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -3106,22 +3106,10 @@ virSecurityLabelDefParseXML(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt,
def->baselabel = p;
}
- /* Only parse model, if static labelling, or a base
- * label is set, or doing active XML
- */
- if (def->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_STATIC ||
- def->baselabel ||
- (!(flags & VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE) &&
- def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE)) {
-
- p = virXPathStringLimit("string(./@model)",
- VIR_SECURITY_MODEL_BUFLEN-1, ctxt);
- if (p == NULL && def->type != VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
- "%s", _("missing security model"));
- }
- def->model = p;
- }
+ /* Always parse model */
+ p = virXPathStringLimit("string(./@model)",
+ VIR_SECURITY_MODEL_BUFLEN-1, ctxt);
+ def->model = p;
return def;
@@ -3133,10 +3121,12 @@ error:
static int
virSecurityLabelDefsParseXML(virDomainDefPtr def,
xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt,
+ virCapsPtr caps,
unsigned int flags)
{
int i = 0, n;
xmlNodePtr *list = NULL, saved_node;
+ virCapsHostPtr host = &caps->host;
/* Check args and save context */
if (def == NULL || ctxt == NULL)
@@ -3163,18 +3153,47 @@ virSecurityLabelDefsParseXML(virDomainDefPtr def,
ctxt->node = saved_node;
VIR_FREE(list);
- /* Checking missing model information
- * when there is more than one seclabel */
- if (n > 1) {
+ /* libvirt versions prior to 0.10.0 support just a single seclabel element
+ * in guest's XML and model attribute can be suppressed if type is none or
+ * type is dynamic, baselabel is not defined and INACTIVE flag is set.
+ *
+ * To avoid compatibility issues, for this specific case the first model
+ * defined in host's capabilities is used as model for the seclabel.
+ */
+ if (def->nseclabels == 1 &&
+ !def->seclabels[0]->model &&
+ host->nsecModels > 0) {
+ if (def->seclabels[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_NONE ||
+ (def->seclabels[0]->type == VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_DYNAMIC &&
+ !def->seclabels[0]->baselabel &&
+ (flags & VIR_DOMAIN_XML_INACTIVE))) {
+ /* Copy model from host. */
+ VIR_DEBUG("Found seclabel without a model, using '%s'",
+ host->secModels[0].model);
+ def->seclabels[0]->model = strdup(host->secModels[0].model);
+ if (!def->seclabels[0]->model) {
+ virReportOOMError();
+ goto error;
+ }
+ } else {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
+ _("missing security model in domain seclabel"));
+ goto error;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Checking missing model information */
+ if (def->nseclabels > 1) {
for(; n; n--) {
if (def->seclabels[n - 1]->model == NULL) {
virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
- _("missing security model "
- "when using multiple labels"));
+ _("missing security model "
+ "when using multiple labels"));
goto error;
}
}
}
+
return 0;
error:
@@ -8170,7 +8189,7 @@ static virDomainDefPtr virDomainDefParseXML(virCapsPtr caps,
/* analysis of security label, done early even though we format it
* late, so devices can refer to this for defaults */
- if (virSecurityLabelDefsParseXML(def, ctxt, flags) == -1)
+ if (virSecurityLabelDefsParseXML(def, ctxt, caps, flags) == -1)
goto error;
/* Extract domain memory */
Okay, ACK,
thanks !
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit
http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel(a)veillard.com | Rpmfind RPM search engine
http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library
http://libvirt.org/