2:43 p.m.
Coverity has been tripped up a few more times recently...
The memory leak patch probably I what I noted from Jiri's recent
CPU series. The return value check is older. It wasn't clear
though if the intention of the module was to ignore errors
so I just chose to error out like other similar callers. If
there's a better way - then other patches can be posted.
John Ferlan (2):
cpu_x86: Fix memory leak - virCPUx86GetHost
cpu_x86: Handle error in x86DataToCPU when calling x86DataAdd
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
2:43 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 1/2] cpu_x86: Fix memory leak - virCPUx86GetHost
Commit 56b254dcc called virCPUx86DataAdd, but returned -1 directly
without calling the virCPUx86DataFree.
Found by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
index 71fc365139..978a60c90a 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
@@ -2791,7 +2791,7 @@ virCPUx86GetHost(virCPUDefPtr cpu,
};
if (virCPUx86DataAdd(cpuData, &item) < 0)
- return -1;
+ goto cleanup;
}
}
--
2.20.1
2:43 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt] [PATCH 2/2] cpu_x86: Handle error in x86DataToCPU when calling x86DataAdd
Commit 9c9620af called x86DataAdd without checking for an error,
so add the error checking.
Found by Coverity
Signed-off-by: John Ferlan <jferlan(a)redhat.com>
---
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
index 978a60c90a..55b55da784 100644
--- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
+++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c
@@ -822,7 +822,8 @@ x86DataToCPU(const virCPUx86Data *data,
for (blocker = hvModel->blockers; *blocker; blocker++) {
if ((feature = x86FeatureFind(map, *blocker)) &&
!x86DataIsSubset(©, &feature->data))
- x86DataAdd(&modelData, &feature->data);
+ if (x86DataAdd(&modelData, &feature->data) < 0)
+ goto error;
}
}
--
2.20.1
2:07 a.m.
On 6/21/19 9:43 PM, John Ferlan wrote:
Coverity has been tripped up a few more times recently...
The memory leak patch probably I what I noted from Jiri's recent
CPU series. The return value check is older. It wasn't clear
though if the intention of the module was to ignore errors
so I just chose to error out like other similar callers. If
there's a better way - then other patches can be posted.
John Ferlan (2):
cpu_x86: Fix memory leak - virCPUx86GetHost
cpu_x86: Handle error in x86DataToCPU when calling x86DataAdd
src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
Michal
2010
days inactive
2011
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
John Ferlan -
Michal Prívozník