On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:45:12AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:27:43AM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:55:00PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > We can't mock tests on Mingw, which lacks dlopen() and friends;
> > follow the paradigms used in other mock files of conditionally
> > compiling nothing when not building for Linux.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake(a)redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tests/virrandommock.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/virrandommock.c b/tests/virrandommock.c
> > index 1f2434e..a69712a 100644
> > --- a/tests/virrandommock.c
> > +++ b/tests/virrandommock.c
> > @@ -20,11 +20,13 @@
> >
> > #include <config.h>
> >
> > -#include "internal.h"
> > -#include "virrandom.h"
> > -#include "virmock.h"
> > +#ifndef WIN32
> >
> > -#define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
> > +# include "internal.h"
> > +# include "virrandom.h"
> > +# include "virmock.h"
> > +
> > +# define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
> >
> > int
> > virRandomBytes(unsigned char *buf,
> > @@ -39,9 +41,9 @@ virRandomBytes(unsigned char *buf,
> > }
> >
> >
> > -#ifdef WITH_GNUTLS
> > -# include <stdio.h>
> > -# include <gnutls/gnutls.h>
> > +# ifdef WITH_GNUTLS
> > +# include <stdio.h>
> > +# include <gnutls/gnutls.h>
> >
> > static int (*real_gnutls_dh_params_generate2)(gnutls_dh_params_t dparams,
> > unsigned int bits);
> > @@ -76,4 +78,7 @@ gnutls_dh_params_generate2(gnutls_dh_params_t dparams,
> >
> > return gnutls_dh_params_cpy(dparams, params_cache);
> > }
> > +# endif
> > +#else /* WIN32 */
> > +/* Can't mock on WIN32 */
>
> Is taht really true? For both cygwin and mingw? If we can't mock on
> WIN32 why don't we just disable those tests and the mocks in Makefile?
> I wish I knew that when I was spending so much time fixing that gnulib
> bug that was causing mingw fails for almost two months =)
Well historical practice for the tests directory is that we do it all
in the .c file, not the makefile. We could re-visit this, but if we
do then any change should be done throughout tests/, not just to this
file.
OK then, if that's the practice. I forgot we are doing SKIPs for
unsupported tests.