On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 12:20:26 +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 04:27:10AM -0400, Li Yang wrote: > >The current message of secret-define always be: > >Secret 09a9736f-eedb-449c-9983-80d0ab67393f created > > >even you just modify the secret, perhaps this may puzzle > >uses. Now this patch make the modify action output message > >like this: > >Secret f2d1bafc-ac58-4a47-93e4-47723686fef5 modified > > > >Signed-off-by: Li Yang <liyang.fnst(a)cn.fujitsu.com&gt; > >--- > > tools/virsh-secret.c | 16 +++++++++++++++- > > 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > >diff --git a/tools/virsh-secret.c b/tools/virsh-secret.c > >index 10d5db3..d1cbe04 100644 > >--- a/tools/virsh-secret.c > >+++ b/tools/virsh-secret.c > >@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ > > #include "virutil.h" > > #include "virxml.h" > > #include "conf/secret_conf.h" > >+#include "viruuid.h" > > > > static virSecretPtr > > vshCommandOptSecret(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd, const char **name) > >@@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) > > char *buffer; > > virSecretPtr res; > > char uuid[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN]; > >+ virSecretDefPtr new_attrs; > > bool ret = false; > > > > if (vshCommandOptStringReq(ctl, cmd, "file", &from) < 0) > >@@ -104,6 +106,12 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) > > if (virFileReadAll(from, VSH_MAX_XML_FILE, &buffer) < 0) > > return false; > > > >+ new_attrs = virSecretDefParseString(buffer); > >+ if (new_attrs == NULL){ > >+ VIR_FREE(buffer); > >+ return false; > >+ } > >+ > > if (!(res = virSecretDefineXML(ctl->conn, buffer, 0))) { > > vshError(ctl, _("Failed to set attributes from %s"), from); > > goto cleanup; > >@@ -114,10 +122,16 @@ cmdSecretDefine(vshControl *ctl, const vshCmd *cmd) > > goto cleanup; > > } > > > >- vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s created\n"), uuid); > >+ char uuidstr[VIR_UUID_STRING_BUFLEN]; > >+ virUUIDFormat(new_attrs->uuid, uuidstr); > >+ if (memcmp(uuid, uuidstr, VIR_UUID_BUFLEN) == 0) > >+ vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s modified\n"), uuid); > >+ else > >+ vshPrint(ctl, _("Secret %s created\n"), uuid); > > ret = true; > > You'll still print 'modified' if the new created secret has an uuid in > the file already, plus it does more parsing, etc. Wouldn't it be > easier to just do s/created/defined/ ? Also you compare just the first VIR_UUID_BUFLEN characters in UUID string. I agree with Martin. Jirka