3:01 a.m.
Apparently, parsing vmx.genid is not as easy as I thought. Anyway, it
was brought up in a private thread that libvirt doesn't report correct
UUIDs. For instance for the following input:
vm.genid = "-8536691797830587195"
vm.genidX = "-1723453263670062919"
Libvirt would report:
<genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
while virt-v2v would report:
<genid>09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8</genid>
Another example:
vm.genid = "-6284418052148993891"
vm.genidX = "-649955058627554545"
Libvirt:
<genid>a8c94313-ed9b-609d-f6fa-e5515a89530f</genid>
virt-v2v:
<genid>ed9b609d-4313-a8c9-0f53-895a51e5faf6</genid>
To test my patch I modified tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.vmx
(because it already contains vmx.genid, but any file can be modified
really), and then ran:
libvirt.git/_build/tests $ VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 VIR_TEST_RANGE=58 ./vmx2xmltest
Mind you, the fix is almost direct rewrite of virt-v2v's algorithm,
except it's optimized for C and not OCaml :-) You can find various
attempts/versions of that on my gitlab:
https://gitlab.com/MichalPrivoznik/libvirt/-/commits/vmx_genid/
I'm sending only the last one because that looks the best IMO.
Michal Prívozník (1):
vmx: Fix <genid/> mapping
src/vmx/vmx.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
3:01 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH 1/1] vmx: Fix <genid/> mapping
Not a long ago I've introduced parsing of vmx.genid and
vmx.genidX properties. They map onto our <genid/> element. The
implementation was quite straightforward: the UUID which is 128
bits long is split into two equally long parts which I then put
next to each other and used virUUIDParse() to fill the UUID
buffer. However, as it turns out it is not that simple - VMX
apparently does swap some byte pairs in both Hi and Lo parts. Do
the reverse so that the UUID is true to its original value.
Mind you, this algorithm is heavily inspired by virt-v2v code:
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/981e0c6b2d2ae0093e3f31829a8d0...
Fixes: 7d661d6e20fe82e5472d5ab6dcd97ed76291f256
Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
---
src/vmx/vmx.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml | 2 +-
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/vmx/vmx.c b/src/vmx/vmx.c
index d3540acd84..f0c30e60b6 100644
--- a/src/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/src/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1347,6 +1347,9 @@ virVMXParseGenID(virConf *conf,
{
long long vmid[2] = { 0 };
g_autofree char *uuidstr = NULL;
+ size_t i;
+ /* This mapping comes from virt-v2v sources. */
+ const int uuidmap[] = {8, 10, 12, 14, 4, 6, 0, 2, 30, 28, 26, 24, 22, 20, 18, 16};
if (virVMXGetConfigLong(conf, "vm.genid", &vmid[0], 0, true) < 0 ||
virVMXGetConfigLong(conf, "vm.genidX", &vmid[1], 0, true) < 0)
@@ -1356,10 +1359,15 @@ virVMXParseGenID(virConf *conf,
return 0;
uuidstr = g_strdup_printf("%.16llx%.16llx", vmid[0], vmid[1]);
- if (virUUIDParse(uuidstr, def->genid) < 0) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("Could not parse UUID from string '%s'"),
uuidstr);
- return -1;
+ /* Ideally we would just call virUUIDParse() and be done, but it's not that
+ * simple. Some bytes in genid and genidX are swapped and we need to swap
+ * them back. This matches what virt-v2v does. */
+ for (i = 0; i < G_N_ELEMENTS(uuidmap); i++) {
+ int idx = uuidmap[i];
+ int val_hi = g_ascii_xdigit_value(uuidstr[idx]);
+ int val_lo = g_ascii_xdigit_value(uuidstr[idx + 1]);
+
+ def->genid[i] = 16 * val_hi + val_lo;
}
def->genidRequested = true;
diff --git a/tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml
b/tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml
index 47ed637920..59cdc68bf3 100644
--- a/tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml
+++ b/tests/vmx2xmldata/esx-in-the-wild-10.xml
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<domain type='vmware'>
<name>w2019biosvmware</name>
<uuid>421a6177-5aa9-abb7-5924-fc376c18a1b4</uuid>
- <genid>13c67c91-9f47-526f-b0d6-e4dd2e4bb4f9</genid>
+ <genid>9f47526f-7c91-13c6-f9b4-4b2edde4d6b0</genid>
<memory unit='KiB'>4194304</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>4194304</currentMemory>
<vcpu placement='static'>2</vcpu>
--
2.32.0
4:20 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:01:55AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Apparently, parsing vmx.genid is not as easy as I thought. Anyway,
it
was brought up in a private thread that libvirt doesn't report correct
UUIDs. For instance for the following input:
vm.genid = "-8536691797830587195"
vm.genidX = "-1723453263670062919"
(The two lines above come from a VMware .vmx file)
The only thing that really matters is what the guest sees. I ran
VMGENID.EXE (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598350#c3
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/win32/hyperv_v2/virtual-machine-...)
inside the guest and it showed:
8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
Note these numbers are the hex equivalents of the VMware .vmx numbers:
>> print("%x" % (2**64-8536691797830587195))
8987940a09512cc5
>> print("%x" % (2**64-1723453263670062919))
e81510634ff550b9
Libvirt would report:
<genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
while virt-v2v would report:
<genid>09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8</genid>
After thinking about this a bit more, IMHO the real problem is
with qemu. If you pass this to qemu:
-device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
then inside the guest VMGENID shows 2cc509518987940a:b950f54f631015e8 (wrong)
If you pass this to qemu:
...guid=09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8...
then inside the guest it sees 8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
(the correct values, matching VMware).
This is the reason why virt-v2v mangles the GUID, in order to trick
libvirt into passing a mangled GUID which gets mangled again by qemu
which is the same as unmangling it.
So another way to fix this could be for us to fix qemu. We could just
pass the two numbers to qemu instead of using GUIDs, eg:
-device vmgenid,low=0x8987940a09512cc5,high=0xe81510634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
and then we'd fix the implementation in qemu so that the low/high
values match what is seen by VMGENID.EXE in the guest.
Or we could have libvirt use the current GUID in <genid> but to do the
mangling when it gets passed through to qemu (instead of virt-v2v
doing the mangling).
Adding qemu-devel because I'm interesting to see if the qemu
developers would prefer to fix this properly in qemu.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
4:33 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:20:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:01:55AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Apparently, parsing vmx.genid is not as easy as I thought. Anyway, it
> was brought up in a private thread that libvirt doesn't report correct
> UUIDs. For instance for the following input:
>
> vm.genid = "-8536691797830587195"
> vm.genidX = "-1723453263670062919"
(The two lines above come from a VMware .vmx file)
The only thing that really matters is what the guest sees. I ran
VMGENID.EXE (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598350#c3
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/win32/hyperv_v2/virtual-machine-...)
inside the guest and it showed:
8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
Note these numbers are the hex equivalents of the VMware .vmx numbers:
>>> print("%x" % (2**64-8536691797830587195))
8987940a09512cc5
>>> print("%x" % (2**64-1723453263670062919))
e81510634ff550b9
> Libvirt would report:
>
> <genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
>
> while virt-v2v would report:
>
> <genid>09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8</genid>
After thinking about this a bit more, IMHO the real problem is
with qemu. If you pass this to qemu:
-device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
then inside the guest VMGENID shows 2cc509518987940a:b950f54f631015e8 (wrong)
If you pass this to qemu:
...guid=09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8...
then inside the guest it sees 8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
(the correct values, matching VMware).
This is the reason why virt-v2v mangles the GUID, in order to trick
libvirt into passing a mangled GUID which gets mangled again by qemu
which is the same as unmangling it.
So another way to fix this could be for us to fix qemu. We could just
pass the two numbers to qemu instead of using GUIDs, eg:
-device vmgenid,low=0x8987940a09512cc5,high=0xe81510634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
and then we'd fix the implementation in qemu so that the low/high
values match what is seen by VMGENID.EXE in the guest.
Or we could have libvirt use the current GUID in <genid> but to do the
mangling when it gets passed through to qemu (instead of virt-v2v
doing the mangling).
On the libvirt side, the #1 most important thing is that a given
XML string
<genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
results in the same value being exposed to the guest OS, for both
the QEMU and VMWare drivers. Whehter the guest sees the bytes in
the same order is not essential, but it would be less of a surprise
if it did match.
Ultimately as long as the mapping from libvirt XML to guest visible
string is consistent across drivers, that's sufficient.
Adding qemu-devel because I'm interesting to see if the qemu
developers would prefer to fix this properly in qemu.
No matter what order QEMU accepts the data in, it can be said to be
functionally correct. If the order is "unusual" though, it ought to
at least be documented how the QEMU order corresponds to guest visible
order.
Incidentally I wonder how much to trust VMGENID.EXE and whether that
actally reports what it gets out of guest memory "as is", or whether
it has done any byte re-ordering.
I'm curious what Linux kernel sees for the genid on Vmware vs KVM
hosts, as probably I'd trust that data more ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
4:46 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:33:43AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:20:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:01:55AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> > Apparently, parsing vmx.genid is not as easy as I thought. Anyway, it
> > was brought up in a private thread that libvirt doesn't report correct
> > UUIDs. For instance for the following input:
> >
> > vm.genid = "-8536691797830587195"
> > vm.genidX = "-1723453263670062919"
>
> (The two lines above come from a VMware .vmx file)
>
> The only thing that really matters is what the guest sees. I ran
> VMGENID.EXE (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598350#c3
>
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/win32/hyperv_v2/virtual-machine-...)
> inside the guest and it showed:
>
> 8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
>
> Note these numbers are the hex equivalents of the VMware .vmx numbers:
>
> >>> print("%x" % (2**64-8536691797830587195))
> 8987940a09512cc5
> >>> print("%x" % (2**64-1723453263670062919))
> e81510634ff550b9
>
> > Libvirt would report:
> >
> > <genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
> >
> > while virt-v2v would report:
> >
> > <genid>09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8</genid>
>
> After thinking about this a bit more, IMHO the real problem is
> with qemu. If you pass this to qemu:
>
> -device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
>
> then inside the guest VMGENID shows 2cc509518987940a:b950f54f631015e8 (wrong)
>
> If you pass this to qemu:
>
> ...guid=09512cc5-940a-8987-b950-f54f631015e8...
>
> then inside the guest it sees 8987940a09512cc5:e81510634ff550b9
> (the correct values, matching VMware).
>
> This is the reason why virt-v2v mangles the GUID, in order to trick
> libvirt into passing a mangled GUID which gets mangled again by qemu
> which is the same as unmangling it.
>
> So another way to fix this could be for us to fix qemu. We could just
> pass the two numbers to qemu instead of using GUIDs, eg:
>
> -device vmgenid,low=0x8987940a09512cc5,high=0xe81510634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
>
> and then we'd fix the implementation in qemu so that the low/high
> values match what is seen by VMGENID.EXE in the guest.
>
> Or we could have libvirt use the current GUID in <genid> but to do the
> mangling when it gets passed through to qemu (instead of virt-v2v
> doing the mangling).
On the libvirt side, the #1 most important thing is that a given
XML string
<genid>8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9</genid>
results in the same value being exposed to the guest OS, for both
the QEMU and VMWare drivers. Whehter the guest sees the bytes in
the same order is not essential, but it would be less of a surprise
if it did match.
I don't know why we decided to use a GUID for this. The feature
itself (https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260709) defines it as
an 128 bit / 8 byte number. The only connection to GUIDs is the size.
Ultimately as long as the mapping from libvirt XML to guest visible
string is consistent across drivers, that's sufficient.
> Adding qemu-devel because I'm interesting to see if the qemu
> developers would prefer to fix this properly in qemu.
No matter what order QEMU accepts the data in, it can be said to be
functionally correct. If the order is "unusual" though, it ought to
at least be documented how the QEMU order corresponds to guest visible
order.
Incidentally I wonder how much to trust VMGENID.EXE and whether that
actally reports what it gets out of guest memory "as is", or whether
it has done any byte re-ordering.
I'm curious what Linux kernel sees for the genid on Vmware vs KVM
hosts, as probably I'd trust that data more ?
As far as I can tell no driver has successfully made it upstream,
although there have been a few attempts:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/1/498
Here's a more recent one from 10 months ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/3E05451B-A9CD-4719-99D0-72750A304044@am...
If I have time I'll patch a Linux kernel with the second patch and see
how it relates to the VMware and KVM parameters, but it probably won't
be today.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
5:07 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:46:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:33:43AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Ultimately as long as the mapping from libvirt XML to guest visible
> string is consistent across drivers, that's sufficient.
>
> > Adding qemu-devel because I'm interesting to see if the qemu
> > developers would prefer to fix this properly in qemu.
>
> No matter what order QEMU accepts the data in, it can be said to be
> functionally correct. If the order is "unusual" though, it ought to
> at least be documented how the QEMU order corresponds to guest visible
> order.
>
> Incidentally I wonder how much to trust VMGENID.EXE and whether that
> actally reports what it gets out of guest memory "as is", or whether
> it has done any byte re-ordering.
>
> I'm curious what Linux kernel sees for the genid on Vmware vs KVM
> hosts, as probably I'd trust that data more ?
As far as I can tell no driver has successfully made it upstream,
although there have been a few attempts:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/1/498
Here's a more recent one from 10 months ago:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/3E05451B-A9CD-4719-99D0-72750A304044@am...
If I have time I'll patch a Linux kernel with the second patch and see
how it relates to the VMware and KVM parameters, but it probably won't
be today.
I'm not sure if we actually need the full driver or not for testing
purposes. The the GenID is just in memory somewhere, and the somewhere
is reported via ACPI table entry. For QEMU its easy as the data is
exposed via fw_cfg which can be read from sysfs directly without
even needing to look at ACPI entries to find it. Not sure how we
find it with VMWare/HyperV though.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
5:24 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:07:30AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
I'm not sure if we actually need the full driver or not for
testing
purposes. The the GenID is just in memory somewhere, and the somewhere
is reported via ACPI table entry. For QEMU its easy as the data is
exposed via fw_cfg which can be read from sysfs directly without
even needing to look at ACPI entries to find it. Not sure how we
find it with VMWare/HyperV though.
This still has the problem that qemu is mangling the vmgenid.
Nevertheless, on qemu-6.1.0-5.fc36.x86_64 I added this to a Linux
guest:
<genid>11223344-5566-7788-99aa-bbccddeeff00</genid>
which turned into:
-device vmgenid,guid=11223344-5566-7788-99aa-bbccddeeff00,id=vmgenid0
Inside the guest:
# ls /sys/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg/by_name/etc/vmgenid_guid/ -l
total 0
-r--------. 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 11:16 key
-r--------. 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 11:16 name
-r--------. 1 root root 0 Sep 29 11:16 raw
-r--------. 1 root root 4096 Sep 29 11:16 size
# hexdump -C /sys/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg/by_name/etc/vmgenid_guid/raw
00000000 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
*
00000020 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 44 33 22 11 66 55 88 77 |........D3".fU.w|
00000030 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
00000040 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................|
*
00001000
But I think what I really need to do is look at the raw physical
address:
# hexdump -C /sys/firmware/qemu_fw_cfg/by_name/etc/vmgenid_addr/raw
00000000 28 f0 ff 7f 00 00 00 00 |(.......|
00000008
# dd if=/dev/mem bs=1 skip=$(( 0x7ffff028 )) count=16 | hexdump -C
16+0 records in
16+0 records out
16 bytes copied, 6.0392e-05 s, 265 kB/s
00000000 44 33 22 11 66 55 88 77 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff 00 |D3".fU.w........|
00000010
I think for VMware I'm really going to need the kernel driver, unless
there's some way that iasl can be used to extract the information?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
5:24 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:46:38AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I don't know why we decided to use a GUID for this. The feature
itself (https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=260709) defines it as
an 128 bit / 8 byte number. The only connection to GUIDs is the size.
*cough* .. 16 bytes :-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
4:57 a.m.
Looking at the qemu code the problem IMHO is:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
This byte swapping makes no sense to me. How do we know that the
guest is little endian? What will this code do for BE guests? I
think qemu would be better off treating the "GUID" as a list of bytes
and writing that exactly into the guest memory.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
5:10 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Looking at the qemu code the problem IMHO is:
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
This byte swapping makes no sense to me. How do we know that the
guest is little endian? What will this code do for BE guests? I
think qemu would be better off treating the "GUID" as a list of bytes
and writing that exactly into the guest memory.
This is an artifact of the HyperV only caring about x86 and thus leaving
endianness unspecified in the spec for GenID. QEMU docs say
Endian-ness Considerations:
---------------------------
Although not specified in Microsoft's document, it is assumed that the
device is expected to use little-endian format.
All GUID passed in via command line or monitor are treated as big-endian.
GUID values displayed via monitor are shown in big-endian format.
So by extension if libvirt is passing the value from its XML straight
to QEMU, then libvirt has effectively defined that the XML is storing
it big-endian too.
This could be where the confusion with VMX config is coming into play,
though the byte re-ordering in v2v seems more complex than just an
endianess-fiddle ?
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
5:34 a.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 11:10:35AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:57:19AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Looking at the qemu code the problem IMHO is:
>
>
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
>
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/blob/6b54a31bf7b403672a798b6443b19...
>
> This byte swapping makes no sense to me. How do we know that the
> guest is little endian? What will this code do for BE guests? I
> think qemu would be better off treating the "GUID" as a list of bytes
> and writing that exactly into the guest memory.
This is an artifact of the HyperV only caring about x86 and thus leaving
endianness unspecified in the spec for GenID. QEMU docs say
Endian-ness Considerations:
---------------------------
Although not specified in Microsoft's document, it is assumed that the
device is expected to use little-endian format.
All GUID passed in via command line or monitor are treated as big-endian.
GUID values displayed via monitor are shown in big-endian format.
So by extension if libvirt is passing the value from its XML straight
to QEMU, then libvirt has effectively defined that the XML is storing
it big-endian too.
This could be where the confusion with VMX config is coming into play,
though the byte re-ordering in v2v seems more complex than just an
endianess-fiddle ?
qemu's qemu_uuid_bswap function only swaps some of the fields.
I think even more that applying qemu_uuid_bswap to these (not really)
"UUIDs" is a nonsense.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
2:33 a.m.
More data: I found a colleague who has a Hyper-V instance with a
Windows guest and he helped me to understand how Hyper-V represents
generation IDs. Hyper-V has had support for generation IDs since long
before Microsoft proposed the feature for standardization. Originally
(I think pre-2013) Hyper-V used an XML description which included:
<generation_id
type="string">4a07df4361fdf4c883f97bc30e524b9d</generation_id>
Note this is a pure hex string, not a GUID.
In current Hyper-V, the same representation is used but it's embedded
in a binary file.
My colleague ran two Windows VMs on Hyper-V and examined the
generation_id on the hypervisor and compared it to the output of
VMGENID.EXE inside the guest.
The first guest had this in the binary hypervisor metadata:
000056b0 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e 5f 69 64 |...generation_id|
000056c0 00 40 00 00 00 38 00 30 00 35 00 61 00 32 00 38 |.@...8.0.5.a.2.8|
000056d0 00 37 00 61 00 32 00 35 00 30 00 39 00 38 00 39 |.7.a.2.5.0.9.8.9|
000056e0 00 65 00 34 00 66 00 65 00 36 00 66 00 36 00 39 |.e.4.f.e.6.f.6.9|
000056f0 00 39 00 32 00 62 00 65 00 33 00 33 00 34 00 61 |.9.2.b.e.3.3.4.a|
00005700 00 34 00 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |.4.3............|
and reported the output of VMGENID in this guest as:
VmCounterValue: fe6f6992be334a43:805a287a250989e4
The second guest had:
00005360 c5 06 00 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e |......generation|
00005370 5f 69 64 00 40 00 00 00 65 00 62 00 66 00 62 00 |_id.@...e.b.f.b.|
00005380 62 00 37 00 39 00 37 00 33 00 36 00 35 00 37 00 |b.7.9.7.3.6.5.7.|
00005390 32 00 38 00 65 00 37 00 30 00 62 00 33 00 66 00 |2.8.e.7.0.b.3.f.|
000053a0 64 00 33 00 63 00 37 00 31 00 33 00 65 00 63 00 |d.3.c.7.1.3.e.c.|
000053b0 65 00 38 00 34 00 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |e.8.4.2.........|
and VMGENID was:
VmCounterValue: b3fd3c713ece842:ebfbb797365728e7
Note:
- In both cases, the generation ID is clearly not a GUID.
- The two 64 bit words are swapped over somewhere, but individual
bytes are not byte-swapped, and there is again no evidence of
UUID-aware byte swapping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how do we get from where we are to a more sane vmgenid in qemu?
I propose we deprecate the guid parameter in:
-device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
Instead it will be replaced by bytes= which will simply write
the bytes, in the order they appear, into guest memory with no
attempt to interpret or byte-swap. Something like:
-device vmgenid,bytes=112233445566778899aabbccddeeff00,id=vmgenid0
(guid although deprecated will need to be kept around for a while,
along with its weird byte-swapping behaviour).
We will then have a plain and simple method to emulate the behaviour
of other hypervisors. We will look at exactly what bytes they write
to guest memory and copy that behaviour when v2v converting from those
hypervisors.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
3:35 a.m.
On 09/30/21 09:33, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
More data: I found a colleague who has a Hyper-V instance with a
Windows guest and he helped me to understand how Hyper-V represents
generation IDs. Hyper-V has had support for generation IDs since long
before Microsoft proposed the feature for standardization. Originally
(I think pre-2013) Hyper-V used an XML description which included:
<generation_id
type="string">4a07df4361fdf4c883f97bc30e524b9d</generation_id>
Note this is a pure hex string, not a GUID.
In current Hyper-V, the same representation is used but it's embedded
in a binary file.
My colleague ran two Windows VMs on Hyper-V and examined the
generation_id on the hypervisor and compared it to the output of
VMGENID.EXE inside the guest.
The first guest had this in the binary hypervisor metadata:
000056b0 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e 5f 69 64 |...generation_id|
000056c0 00 40 00 00 00 38 00 30 00 35 00 61 00 32 00 38 |.@...8.0.5.a.2.8|
000056d0 00 37 00 61 00 32 00 35 00 30 00 39 00 38 00 39 |.7.a.2.5.0.9.8.9|
000056e0 00 65 00 34 00 66 00 65 00 36 00 66 00 36 00 39 |.e.4.f.e.6.f.6.9|
000056f0 00 39 00 32 00 62 00 65 00 33 00 33 00 34 00 61 |.9.2.b.e.3.3.4.a|
00005700 00 34 00 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |.4.3............|
and reported the output of VMGENID in this guest as:
VmCounterValue: fe6f6992be334a43:805a287a250989e4
The second guest had:
00005360 c5 06 00 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e |......generation|
00005370 5f 69 64 00 40 00 00 00 65 00 62 00 66 00 62 00 |_id.@...e.b.f.b.|
00005380 62 00 37 00 39 00 37 00 33 00 36 00 35 00 37 00 |b.7.9.7.3.6.5.7.|
00005390 32 00 38 00 65 00 37 00 30 00 62 00 33 00 66 00 |2.8.e.7.0.b.3.f.|
000053a0 64 00 33 00 63 00 37 00 31 00 33 00 65 00 63 00 |d.3.c.7.1.3.e.c.|
000053b0 65 00 38 00 34 00 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |e.8.4.2.........|
and VMGENID was:
VmCounterValue: b3fd3c713ece842:ebfbb797365728e7
Note:
- In both cases, the generation ID is clearly not a GUID.
- The two 64 bit words are swapped over somewhere, but individual
bytes are not byte-swapped, and there is again no evidence of
UUID-aware byte swapping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how do we get from where we are to a more sane vmgenid in qemu?
I propose we deprecate the guid parameter in:
-device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
Instead it will be replaced by bytes= which will simply write
the bytes, in the order they appear, into guest memory with no
attempt to interpret or byte-swap. Something like:
-device vmgenid,bytes=112233445566778899aabbccddeeff00,id=vmgenid0
(guid although deprecated will need to be kept around for a while,
along with its weird byte-swapping behaviour).
We will then have a plain and simple method to emulate the behaviour
of other hypervisors. We will look at exactly what bytes they write
to guest memory and copy that behaviour when v2v converting from those
hypervisors.
I don't have anything against this, I just don't know who's going to
implement the QEMU change.
Thanks
Laszlo
3:47 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:33:48AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
More data: I found a colleague who has a Hyper-V instance with a
Windows guest and he helped me to understand how Hyper-V represents
generation IDs. Hyper-V has had support for generation IDs since long
before Microsoft proposed the feature for standardization. Originally
(I think pre-2013) Hyper-V used an XML description which included:
<generation_id
type="string">4a07df4361fdf4c883f97bc30e524b9d</generation_id>
Note this is a pure hex string, not a GUID.
In current Hyper-V, the same representation is used but it's embedded
in a binary file.
My colleague ran two Windows VMs on Hyper-V and examined the
generation_id on the hypervisor and compared it to the output of
VMGENID.EXE inside the guest.
The first guest had this in the binary hypervisor metadata:
000056b0 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e 5f 69 64 |...generation_id|
000056c0 00 40 00 00 00 38 00 30 00 35 00 61 00 32 00 38 |.@...8.0.5.a.2.8|
000056d0 00 37 00 61 00 32 00 35 00 30 00 39 00 38 00 39 |.7.a.2.5.0.9.8.9|
000056e0 00 65 00 34 00 66 00 65 00 36 00 66 00 36 00 39 |.e.4.f.e.6.f.6.9|
000056f0 00 39 00 32 00 62 00 65 00 33 00 33 00 34 00 61 |.9.2.b.e.3.3.4.a|
00005700 00 34 00 33 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |.4.3............|
and reported the output of VMGENID in this guest as:
VmCounterValue: fe6f6992be334a43:805a287a250989e4
The second guest had:
00005360 c5 06 00 00 00 0e 67 65 6e 65 72 61 74 69 6f 6e |......generation|
00005370 5f 69 64 00 40 00 00 00 65 00 62 00 66 00 62 00 |_id.@...e.b.f.b.|
00005380 62 00 37 00 39 00 37 00 33 00 36 00 35 00 37 00 |b.7.9.7.3.6.5.7.|
00005390 32 00 38 00 65 00 37 00 30 00 62 00 33 00 66 00 |2.8.e.7.0.b.3.f.|
000053a0 64 00 33 00 63 00 37 00 31 00 33 00 65 00 63 00 |d.3.c.7.1.3.e.c.|
000053b0 65 00 38 00 34 00 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |e.8.4.2.........|
and VMGENID was:
VmCounterValue: b3fd3c713ece842:ebfbb797365728e7
Note:
- In both cases, the generation ID is clearly not a GUID.
- The two 64 bit words are swapped over somewhere, but individual
bytes are not byte-swapped, and there is again no evidence of
UUID-aware byte swapping.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So how do we get from where we are to a more sane vmgenid in qemu?
I propose we deprecate the guid parameter in:
-device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
Instead it will be replaced by bytes= which will simply write
the bytes, in the order they appear, into guest memory with no
attempt to interpret or byte-swap. Something like:
-device vmgenid,bytes=112233445566778899aabbccddeeff00,id=vmgenid0
(guid although deprecated will need to be kept around for a while,
along with its weird byte-swapping behaviour).
We will then have a plain and simple method to emulate the behaviour
of other hypervisors. We will look at exactly what bytes they write
to guest memory and copy that behaviour when v2v converting from those
hypervisors.
From the libvirt POV, I'm not expecting anything in QEMU to change
in this respect. If guid is replaced by a new attribute taking data
in a different way, then libvirt will have to remap itself, so that
existing usage in libvirt keeps working the same way as it did with
guid. Essentially from libvirt's POV, it is simply a documentation
issue to specify how the libvirt XML representation translates to
the guest visible representation, and ensure that all libvirt drivers
implement it the same way. The QEMU genid support arrived first so
that set the standard for how libvirt will represent it, that all
further libvirt hypervisor drivers need to match.
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
4:16 a.m.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 09:47:01AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 08:33:48AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I propose we deprecate the guid parameter in:
>
> -device vmgenid,guid=8987940a-0951-2cc5-e815-10634ff550b9,id=vmgenid0
>
> Instead it will be replaced by bytes= which will simply write
> the bytes, in the order they appear, into guest memory with no
> attempt to interpret or byte-swap. Something like:
>
> -device vmgenid,bytes=112233445566778899aabbccddeeff00,id=vmgenid0
>
> (guid although deprecated will need to be kept around for a while,
> along with its weird byte-swapping behaviour).
>
> We will then have a plain and simple method to emulate the behaviour
> of other hypervisors. We will look at exactly what bytes they write
> to guest memory and copy that behaviour when v2v converting from those
> hypervisors.
From the libvirt POV, I'm not expecting anything in QEMU to change
in this respect. If guid is replaced by a new attribute taking data
in a different way, then libvirt will have to remap itself, so that
existing usage in libvirt keeps working the same way as it did with
guid. Essentially from libvirt's POV, it is simply a documentation
issue to specify how the libvirt XML representation translates to
the guest visible representation, and ensure that all libvirt drivers
implement it the same way. The QEMU genid support arrived first so
that set the standard for how libvirt will represent it, that all
further libvirt hypervisor drivers need to match.
I was going to suggest something like:
<genid type="guid">aa-bb-cc..</genid>
or
<genid type="binary">aabbcc..</genid>
with the type defaulting to guid for backwards compatibility.
Does libvirt XML have any other fields were you're passing
essentially small snippets of binary data?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org
4:59 a.m.
It turns out that changing the qemu implementation is painful,
particularly if we wish to maintain backwards compatibility of the
command line and live migration.
Instead I opted to document comprehensively what all the
different hypervisors do:
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/master/docs/vm-generation-id-...
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:16:20AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I was going to suggest something like:
<genid type="guid">aa-bb-cc..</genid>
or
<genid type="binary">aabbcc..</genid>
After thinking about this some more, the real implementation on
Windows guest and host is two 64 bit little-endian integers[1]. How
about implementing this exactly the same way as Hyper-V (and VMware):
<genid type="pair">
<low>0x8877665544332211</low>
<high>0x00ffeeddccbbaa99</high>
</genid>
This would have to be mapped to the following qemu command line:
qemu -device vmgenid,guid=44332211-6655-8877-99aa-bbccddeeff00
which would unmangle to the following in guest physical memory:
11 22 33 44 55 66 77 88 99 aa bb cc dd ee ff 00
The equivalent back-compat option would be:
<genid type="qemu">44332211-6655-8877-99aa-bbccddeeff00</genid>
Rich.
[1] No one has ever thought what to do about big-endian guests.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
9:50 a.m.
On 10/04/21 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
It turns out that changing the qemu implementation is painful,
particularly if we wish to maintain backwards compatibility of the
command line and live migration.
Instead I opted to document comprehensively what all the
different hypervisors do:
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/master/docs/vm-generation-id-...
Unfortunately QEMU made a significant mistake when implementing this
feature. Because the string is 128 bits wrong, they decided it must
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Haha, that's a great typo :)
be a UUID (as you can see above there is no evidence that Microsoft
who wrote the original spec thought it was). Following from this
incorrect assumption, they stated that the "UUID" must be supplied to
qemu in big endian format and must be byteswapped when writing it to
guest memory. Their documentation says that they only do this for
little endian guests, but this is not true of their implementation
which byte swaps it for all guests.
I don't think this is what section "Endian-ness Considerations" in
"docs/specs/vmgenid.txt" says. That text says that the *device* uses
little-endian format. That's independent of the endianness of *CPU* of
the particular guest architecture.
So the byte-swapping in the QEMU code occurs unconditionally because
QEMU's UUID type is inherently big endian, and the device model in
question is fixed little endian. The guest CPU's endianness is
irrelevant as far as the device is concerned.
If a BE guest CPU intends to read the generation ID and to interpret it
as a set of integers, then the guest CPU is supposed to byte-swap the
appropriate fields itself.
References
I suggest adding two links in this section, namely to:
- docs/specs/vmgenid.txt
- hw/acpi/vmgenid.c
Thanks,
Laszlo
9:59 a.m.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2021 at 04:50:51PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 10/04/21 11:59, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It turns out that changing the qemu implementation is painful,
> particularly if we wish to maintain backwards compatibility of the
> command line and live migration.
>
> Instead I opted to document comprehensively what all the
> different hypervisors do:
>
>
https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/master/docs/vm-generation-id-...
> Unfortunately QEMU made a significant mistake when implementing this
> feature. Because the string is 128 bits wrong, they decided it must
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Haha, that's a great typo :)
> be a UUID (as you can see above there is no evidence that Microsoft
> who wrote the original spec thought it was). Following from this
> incorrect assumption, they stated that the "UUID" must be supplied to
> qemu in big endian format and must be byteswapped when writing it to
> guest memory. Their documentation says that they only do this for
> little endian guests, but this is not true of their implementation
> which byte swaps it for all guests.
I don't think this is what section "Endian-ness Considerations" in
"docs/specs/vmgenid.txt" says. That text says that the *device* uses
little-endian format. That's independent of the endianness of *CPU* of
the particular guest architecture.
So the byte-swapping in the QEMU code occurs unconditionally because
QEMU's UUID type is inherently big endian, and the device model in
question is fixed little endian. The guest CPU's endianness is
irrelevant as far as the device is concerned.
If a BE guest CPU intends to read the generation ID and to interpret it
as a set of integers, then the guest CPU is supposed to byte-swap the
appropriate fields itself.
> References
I suggest adding two links in this section, namely to:
- docs/specs/vmgenid.txt
- hw/acpi/vmgenid.c
Fair enough - I've made the changes you suggest (same URL as above).
Thanks,
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
1146
days inactive
1151
days old
17 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Daniel P. Berrangé -
Laszlo Ersek -
Michal Privoznik -
Richard W.M. Jones