The bootstrap.conf is licensed under the terms of the LGPL, but then suggests to "See the GNU General Public License for more details". That should be the "GNU Lesser General Public License" instead, of course. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com&gt; --- bootstrap.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf index d9e2b06..c2194df 100644 --- a/bootstrap.conf +++ b/bootstrap.conf @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ # This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, # but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of # MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the -# GNU General Public License for more details. +# GNU Lesser General Public License for more details. # You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public # License along with this library. If not, see -- 1.8.3.1

There is no "GNU Lesser General Public License, version 2", only version 2.1 and later. In "version 2", the license was still called "Library" instead of "Lesser". So assume that version 2.1 is meant here. Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth(a)redhat.com&gt; --- docs/governance.html.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/governance.html.in b/docs/governance.html.in index e9608f6..61ab52c 100644 --- a/docs/governance.html.in +++ b/docs/governance.html.in @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ also implicitly stating that they have the legal right to make the contribution, if doing so on behalf of a broader organization / company. Most of the project's code is distributed under the GNU - Lesser General Public License, version 2 or later. Details of the + Lesser General Public License, version 2.1 or later. Details of the exact license under which contributions will be presumed to be covered are found in the source repositories, or website in question. </p> -- 1.8.3.1