1:42 a.m.
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will be execute.
we fix it as return 0
---
src/libxl/libxl_domain.h | 2 +-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/libxl/libxl_domain.h b/src/libxl/libxl_domain.h
index 3a3890b..dc40139 100644
--- a/src/libxl/libxl_domain.h
+++ b/src/libxl/libxl_domain.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
# include "libxl_conf.h"
# include "virchrdev.h"
-# define JOB_MASK(job) (1 << (job - 1))
+# define JOB_MASK(job) (job == 0 ? 0 : 1 << (job - 1))
# define DEFAULT_JOB_MASK \
(JOB_MASK(LIBXL_JOB_DESTROY) | \
JOB_MASK(LIBXL_JOB_ABORT))
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
index 365b23c..6750215 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
# define QEMU_DOMAIN_MIG_BANDWIDTH_MAX (INT64_MAX / (1024 * 1024))
# endif
-# define JOB_MASK(job) (1 << (job - 1))
+# define JOB_MASK(job) (job == 0 ? 0 : 1 << (job - 1))
# define QEMU_JOB_DEFAULT_MASK \
(JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_QUERY) | \
JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_DESTROY) | \
--
2.8.3
5:15 a.m.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 14:42:39 +0800, xinhua.Cao wrote:
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will be execute.
we fix it as return 0
---
src/libxl/libxl_domain.h | 2 +-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[....]
index 365b23c..6750215 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
# define QEMU_DOMAIN_MIG_BANDWIDTH_MAX (INT64_MAX / (1024 * 1024))
# endif
-# define JOB_MASK(job) (1 << (job - 1))
+# define JOB_MASK(job) (job == 0 ? 0 : 1 << (job - 1))
This makes QEMU_JOB_NONE and QEMU_JOB_QUERY to have the same result.
I think you need to fix some other place.
What is the problem you are seeing?
7:46 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] 答复: [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Peter Krempa [mailto:pkrempa@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月17日 18:15
收件人: Caoxinhua
抄送: libvir-list(a)redhat.com; jferlan(a)redhat.com; Yanqiangjun; Huangweidong (C); weifuqiang
主题: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 14:42:39 +0800, xinhua.Cao wrote:
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will
be execute. we fix it as return 0
---
src/libxl/libxl_domain.h | 2 +-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[....]
index 365b23c..6750215 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
# define QEMU_DOMAIN_MIG_BANDWIDTH_MAX (INT64_MAX / (1024 * 1024))
# endif
-# define JOB_MASK(job) (1 << (job - 1))
+# define JOB_MASK(job) (job == 0 ? 0 : 1 << (job - 1))
This makes QEMU_JOB_NONE and QEMU_JOB_QUERY to have the same result.
I think you need to fix some other place.
What is the problem you are seeing?
7:58 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] 答复: [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
1、JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE) = 0; JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_QUERY) = 1;
2、It isn't a question, but it looked awkward.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Peter Krempa [mailto:pkrempa@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月17日 18:15
收件人: Caoxinhua
抄送: libvir-list(a)redhat.com; jferlan(a)redhat.com; Yanqiangjun; Huangweidong (C); weifuqiang
主题: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 14:42:39 +0800, xinhua.Cao wrote:
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will
be execute. we fix it as return 0
---
src/libxl/libxl_domain.h | 2 +-
src/qemu/qemu_domain.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[....]
index 365b23c..6750215 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain.h
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
# define QEMU_DOMAIN_MIG_BANDWIDTH_MAX (INT64_MAX / (1024 * 1024))
# endif
-# define JOB_MASK(job) (1 << (job - 1))
+# define JOB_MASK(job) (job == 0 ? 0 : 1 << (job - 1))
This makes QEMU_JOB_NONE and QEMU_JOB_QUERY to have the same result.
I think you need to fix some other place.
What is the problem you are seeing?
8:30 a.m.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 14:42:39 +0800, xinhua.Cao wrote:
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will be execute.
we fix it as return 0
Could you point us to the place in our code where JOB_MASK is called on
QEMU_JOB_NONE?
Jirka
9:04 p.m.
New subject: [libvirt] 答复: [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
When we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE) at follow backtrace
Breakpoint 1, qemuDomainObjPrivateXMLFormat (buf=0x7f8078fcd510, vm=0x7f808c2c7d70) at
qemu/qemu_domain.c:1779
1779 if (!qemuDomainTrackJob(job))
(gdb) p job
$1 = QEMU_JOB_NONE
(gdb) bt
#0 qemuDomainObjPrivateXMLFormat (buf=0x7f8078fcd510, vm=0x7f808c2c7d70) at
qemu/qemu_domain.c:1779
#1 0x00007f80899e7988 in virDomainObjFormat (xmlopt=0x7f808c275c60,
obj=obj@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70, caps=0x7f808c25b450, flags=flags@entry=625)
at conf/domain_conf.c:24936
#2 0x00007f80899e7a5c in virDomainSaveStatus (xmlopt=<optimized out>,
statusDir=0x7f808c28de30 "/var/run/libvirt/qemu",
obj=obj@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70, caps=<optimized out>) at conf/domain_conf.c:25149
#3 0x00007f806f7d8840 in qemuProcessLaunch (conn=conn@entry=0x7f805c0047c0,
driver=driver@entry=0x7f808c2d1530, vm=vm@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70,
asyncJob=asyncJob@entry=QEMU_ASYNC_JOB_START, incoming=incoming@entry=0x0,
snapshot=snapshot@entry=0x0,
vmop=vmop@entry=VIR_NETDEV_VPORT_PROFILE_OP_CREATE, flags=flags@entry=17) at
qemu/qemu_process.c:5757
this is not a problem, just looks very awkward.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Jiri Denemark [mailto:jdenemar@redhat.com]
发送时间: 2017年7月17日 21:31
收件人: Caoxinhua
抄送: libvir-list(a)redhat.com; jferlan(a)redhat.com; Yanqiangjun; Huangweidong (C); weifuqiang
主题: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 14:42:39 +0800, xinhua.Cao wrote:
From: caoxinhua <caoxinhua(a)huawei.com>
when we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE), then 1 << -1 will
be execute. we fix it as return 0
Could you point us to the place in our code where JOB_MASK is called on QEMU_JOB_NONE?
Jirka
6:09 a.m.
New subject: [libvirt] 答复: [PATCH] fix 1 << -1 at JOB_MASK macro
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 02:04:27 +0000, Caoxinhua wrote:
When we start a vm, we call JOB_MASK(QEMU_JOB_NONE) at follow
backtrace
Breakpoint 1, qemuDomainObjPrivateXMLFormat (buf=0x7f8078fcd510, vm=0x7f808c2c7d70) at
qemu/qemu_domain.c:1779
1779 if (!qemuDomainTrackJob(job))
(gdb) p job
$1 = QEMU_JOB_NONE
(gdb) bt
#0 qemuDomainObjPrivateXMLFormat (buf=0x7f8078fcd510, vm=0x7f808c2c7d70) at
qemu/qemu_domain.c:1779
#1 0x00007f80899e7988 in virDomainObjFormat (xmlopt=0x7f808c275c60,
obj=obj@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70, caps=0x7f808c25b450, flags=flags@entry=625)
at conf/domain_conf.c:24936
#2 0x00007f80899e7a5c in virDomainSaveStatus (xmlopt=<optimized out>,
statusDir=0x7f808c28de30 "/var/run/libvirt/qemu",
obj=obj@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70, caps=<optimized out>) at
conf/domain_conf.c:25149
#3 0x00007f806f7d8840 in qemuProcessLaunch (conn=conn@entry=0x7f805c0047c0,
driver=driver@entry=0x7f808c2d1530, vm=vm@entry=0x7f808c2c7d70,
asyncJob=asyncJob@entry=QEMU_ASYNC_JOB_START, incoming=incoming@entry=0x0,
snapshot=snapshot@entry=0x0,
vmop=vmop@entry=VIR_NETDEV_VPORT_PROFILE_OP_CREATE, flags=flags@entry=17) at
qemu/qemu_process.c:5757
Yes, you're right. ACK to the patch.
Jirka
2682
days inactive
2687
days old
6 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Caoxinhua -
Jiri Denemark -
Peter Krempa -
xinhua.Cao