On 03/28/2012 12:57 PM, Laine Stump wrote:
Is this patch too much "new code" to push now?
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-March/msg01228.html
The reasons I ask are two-fold -
1) it sat for a long time before anybody reviewed it.
2) I just noticed that there is a bug in the existing code that fails to
flag a change in bridge name as an error (although it does nothing with
it), and this patch would remedy that, so in one way it could be
considered a bugfix.
I'm okay calling it a bugfix and pushing it now; the code has been
available pre-freeze, and appears to be relatively isolated in what it
touches.
--
Eric Blake eblake(a)redhat.com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org