Wei Liu writes ("Re: [PATCH] libxl: libxl_domain_create_restore has an extra
argument"):
CC Jim as well
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:20:12PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> In the latest libxenlight code, libxl_domain_create_restore accepts a
> new argument. Update libvirt's libxl driver for that. Use the macro
> provided by libxenlight to detect which version should be used.
>
> The new parameter (send_back_fd) is set to -1 because libvirt provides
> no such fd.
...
> -#ifdef LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_CREATE_RESTORE_PARAMS
> +#if defined(LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_CREATE_RESTORE_SEND_BACK_FD)
> + params.checkpointed_stream = 0;
> + ret = libxl_domain_create_restore(cfg->ctx, &d_config, &domid,
> + restore_fd, -1, ¶ms, NULL,
> + &aop_console_how);
> +#elif defined(LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_CREATE_RESTORE_PARAMS)
> params.checkpointed_stream = 0;
> ret = libxl_domain_create_restore(cfg->ctx, &d_config, &domid,
> restore_fd, ¶ms, NULL,
Another approach would be
ret = libxl_domain_create_restore(cfg->ctx, &d_config, &domid,
restore_fd,
#ifdef LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_CREATE_RESTORE_SEND_BACK_FD
-1,
#endif
#ifdef LIBXL_HAVE_DOMAIN_CREATE_RESTORE_PARAMS
¶ms,
#endif
NULL, &aop_console_how);
But which to choose is a matter of taste.
Ian.