On 07/19/2011 08:47 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:46:49AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: >>Maybe we can cache the png data per detected OS value rather than per >>VM? Not sure if that collides with licensing issues, but would likely >>mean storing less data on disk. > >You can't do that without getting into trademark issues. The icon >that is displayed must have come from precisely the same guest. > >The icons are not large anyhow. > >One thing I meant to ask about Dan's proposal: > >>> $HOME/.local/libvirt/$CONN_URI/$DOMAIN_UUID/screenshot.png >>> $HOME/.local/libvirt/$CONN_URI/$DOMAIN_UUID/icon.png >>> $HOME/.local/libvirt/$CONN_URI/$DOMAIN_UUID/osinfo.json > >Do we need the connection URI? Isn't the dom UUID unique enough? Technically, a UUID should be unique enough. But right now, libvirt does not enforce cross-connection uniqueness, and it is possible to reuse a uuid value across hypervisors (even though such reuse violates the definition of uuid), so using $CONN_URI protects us from that potential for reuse. Besides, we already use $CONN_URI in the paths of other files, such as per-domain logs (for example, /var/log/libvirt/$CONN_URI/$DOMAIN_NAME.log), so it's a reasonable proposal to keep that naming hierarchy elsewhere.