n Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:49 +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:41:15 +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> Commit 871e10f fixed a memory corruption error, but called strlen()
> twice on the same string to do so. Even though the compiler is
> probably smart enough to optimize the second call away, having a
> single invocation makes the code slightly cleaner.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
> ---
>
> How about this? :)
>
> src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c b/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
> index db01dcf..9283bbb 100644
> --- a/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
> +++ b/src/util/virnetdevopenvswitch.c
> @@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ int virNetDevOpenvswitchRemovePort(const char *brname
ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, const ch
> int virNetDevOpenvswitchGetMigrateData(char **migrate, const char *ifname)
> {
> virCommandPtr cmd = NULL;
> + size_t len;
> int ret = -1;
>
> cmd = virCommandNewArgList(OVSVSCTL, "--timeout=5",
"--if-exists", "get", "Interface",
> @@ -223,8 +224,9 @@ int virNetDevOpenvswitchGetMigrateData(char **migrate, const
char *ifname)
> }
>
> /* Wipeout the newline, if it exists */
> - if (strlen(*migrate) > 0)
> - (*migrate)[strlen(*migrate) - 1] = '\0';
Or just
if (**migrate)
(*migrate)[strlen(*migrate) - 1] = '\0';
(or similar check for the first character in *migrate) since we only
need to check if it's empty or not :-)
Yeah, that would work just as nicely, and would even save us the
call to strlen() altogether when the string is empty.
However, I'd argue that it makes the code a tiny bit more opaque
rather than a tiny bit cleaner, so I'd still go with the version
I posted if that's okay with you :)
Cheers.
--
Andrea Bolognani
Software Engineer - Virtualization Team