On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
'-numa mem' option has a number of issues and mgmt often
defaults
to it. Unfortunately it's no possible to replace it with an alternative
'-numa memdev' without breaking migration compatibility. What's possible
though is to deprecate it, keeping option working with old machine types.
Once deprecation period expires, QEMU will disable '-numa mem' option,
usage on new machine types and when the last machine type that supported
it is removed we would be able to remove '-numa mem' with associated code.
In order to help mgmt to find out if being deprecated CLI option
'-numa mem=SZ' is still supported by particular machine type, expose
this information via "numa-mem-supported" machine property.
Users can use "qom-list-properties" QMP command to list machine type
properties including initial proprety values (when probing for supported
machine types with '-machine none') or at runtime at preconfig time
before numa mapping is configured and decide if they should used legacy
'-numa mem' or alternative '-numa memdev' option.
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo(a)redhat.com>
---
include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
hw/arm/virt.c | 1 +
hw/core/machine.c | 12 ++++++++++++
hw/i386/pc.c | 1 +
hw/ppc/spapr.c | 1 +
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/hw/boards.h b/include/hw/boards.h
index 6f7916f..9e347cf 100644
--- a/include/hw/boards.h
+++ b/include/hw/boards.h
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ struct MachineClass {
bool ignore_boot_device_suffixes;
bool smbus_no_migration_support;
bool nvdimm_supported;
+ bool numa_mem_supported;
HotplugHandler *(*get_hotplug_handler)(MachineState *machine,
DeviceState *dev);
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index 5331ab7..2e86c78 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -1943,6 +1943,7 @@ static void virt_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
assert(!mc->get_hotplug_handler);
mc->get_hotplug_handler = virt_machine_get_hotplug_handler;
hc->plug = virt_machine_device_plug_cb;
+ mc->numa_mem_supported = true;
}
static void virt_instance_init(Object *obj)
diff --git a/hw/core/machine.c b/hw/core/machine.c
index 5d046a4..8bc53ba 100644
--- a/hw/core/machine.c
+++ b/hw/core/machine.c
@@ -506,6 +506,13 @@ static char *machine_get_nvdimm_persistence(Object *obj, Error
**errp)
return g_strdup(ms->nvdimms_state->persistence_string);
}
+static bool machine_get_numa_mem_supported(Object *obj, Error **errp)
+{
+ MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(obj);
+
+ return mc->numa_mem_supported;
I don't remember other cases where a property value is constant
for all instances of a given class, but still requires
instantiating an object just to look at the value of the
property. Is this really a pattern we want to start using in
QEMU?
Why hiding numa_mem_supported behind qom-list-properties is
better than simply extending the QAPI schema to add a new field
to MachineInfo? Extending MachineInfo is simple and obvious, and
it makes the new machine class attribute be explicitly documented
in the QAPI schema.
+}
+
static void machine_set_nvdimm_persistence(Object *obj, const char *value,
Error **errp)
{
@@ -810,6 +817,11 @@ static void machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
&error_abort);
object_class_property_set_description(oc, "memory-encryption",
"Set memory encryption object to use", &error_abort);
+
+ object_class_property_add_bool(oc, "numa-mem-supported",
+ machine_get_numa_mem_supported, NULL, &error_abort);
+ object_class_property_set_description(oc, "numa-mem-supported",
+ "Shows if legacy '-numa mem=SIZE option is supported",
&error_abort);
}
static void machine_class_base_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
index de91e90..bec0055 100644
--- a/hw/i386/pc.c
+++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
@@ -2756,6 +2756,7 @@ static void pc_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
nc->nmi_monitor_handler = x86_nmi;
mc->default_cpu_type = TARGET_DEFAULT_CPU_TYPE;
mc->nvdimm_supported = true;
+ mc->numa_mem_supported = true;
object_class_property_add(oc, PC_MACHINE_DEVMEM_REGION_SIZE, "int",
pc_machine_get_device_memory_region_size, NULL,
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
index 2ef3ce4..265ecfb 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
@@ -4336,6 +4336,7 @@ static void spapr_machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
* in which LMBs are represented and hot-added
*/
mc->numa_mem_align_shift = 28;
+ mc->numa_mem_supported = true;
smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_HTM] = SPAPR_CAP_OFF;
smc->default_caps.caps[SPAPR_CAP_VSX] = SPAPR_CAP_ON;
--
2.7.4
--
Eduardo