On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:45:29 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; > --- > docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml > index 86c7734694..79b5658cc3 100644 > --- a/docs/news.xml > +++ b/docs/news.xml > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ > release. > </description> > </change> > + <change> > + <summary> > + Removed support for VirtualBox versions &lt; 5.0 > + </summary> > + <description> > + Support for managing VirtualBox releases prior to 5.0 has > + been dropped. The upstream project has declared that these > + versions are end of life several years ago. In some previous versions we had <section title="Removed features">. Selling this as 'Improvement' is probably not entirely correct from users PoV.

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:57:28 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:56:12AM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 10:45:29 +0100, Daniel Berrange wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange(a)redhat.com&gt; > > > --- > > > docs/news.xml | 10 ++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/docs/news.xml b/docs/news.xml > > > index 86c7734694..79b5658cc3 100644 > > > --- a/docs/news.xml > > > +++ b/docs/news.xml > > > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ > > > release. > > > </description> > > > </change> > > > + <change> > > > + <summary> > > > + Removed support for VirtualBox versions &lt; 5.0 > > > + </summary> > > > + <description> > > > + Support for managing VirtualBox releases prior to 5.0 has > > > + been dropped. The upstream project has declared that these > > > + versions are end of life several years ago. > > > > In some previous versions we had <section title="Removed features">. > > > > Selling this as 'Improvement' is probably not entirely correct from > > users PoV. > > Heh, ok. I thought forcing people off 5+ year old software was an > improvement :-P Generally that's true, butt when it breaks your setup you would not consider that an improvement :). ACK, but make sure that you run syntax-check prior to pushing. I'm not sure whether the schema for <summary> allows &lt;.