On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 16:05:03 -0700, Vivek Kashyap wrote:
Introduce XML parsing and formatting of vf-token attribute
Signed-off-by: Vivek Kashyap <vivek.kashyap(a)linux.intel.com>
---
src/conf/device_conf.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
src/conf/domain_conf.c | 5 +++++
src/conf/schemas/basictypes.rng | 11 +++++++++++
src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 1 +
src/libvirt_private.syms | 1 +
src/util/virpci.c | 5 +++++
6 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/conf/device_conf.c b/src/conf/device_conf.c
index f3d977f2b7..d5ed4ef452 100644
--- a/src/conf/device_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/device_conf.c
@@ -188,11 +188,20 @@ virDeviceInfoPCIAddressExtensionIsWanted(const virDomainDeviceInfo
*info)
virZPCIDeviceAddressIsIncomplete(&info->addr.pci.zpci);
}
+bool
+virDeviceExtensionIsPresent(const virPCIDeviceAddress *pci)
+{
+ return ((pci->extFlags & VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_ZPCI) &&
+ virZPCIDeviceAddressIsPresent(&pci->zpci)) ||
+ ((pci->extFlags & VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_VFTOKEN) &&
+ pci->token.isSet);
The code alignment is broken here. Also add a function documentation
describing what this function does as it's really not obvious.
+}
+
Code style dictates two empty lines between functions.
bool
virDeviceInfoPCIAddressExtensionIsPresent(const virDomainDeviceInfo *info)
{
- return (info->addr.pci.extFlags & VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_ZPCI) &&
- virZPCIDeviceAddressIsPresent(&info->addr.pci.zpci);
+ return (info->addr.pci.extFlags != VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_NONE) &&
+ virDeviceExtensionIsPresent(&info->addr.pci);
This change is suspicious and should be justified. I'm not going to
comment on whether it's correct or not.
}
int
@@ -200,6 +209,7 @@ virPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
virPCIDeviceAddress *addr)
{
xmlNodePtr zpci;
+ xmlNodePtr token;
memset(addr, 0, sizeof(*addr));
@@ -231,6 +241,10 @@ virPCIDeviceAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
return -1;
}
+ if ((token = virXMLNodeGetSubelement(node, "vf-token")))
Multi-line condition bodies dictate use of a { } block around it.
+ if (virPCIDeviceTokenParseXML(token, addr) < 0)
+ return -1;
This one is okay though.
+
return 0;
}
@@ -248,6 +262,19 @@ virPCIDeviceAddressFormat(virBuffer *buf,
addr.function);
}
+int
+virPCIDeviceTokenParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
+ virPCIDeviceAddress *addr)
+{
+ if (virXMLPropUUID(node, "uuid", VIR_XML_PROP_NONE,
+ addr->token.uuid) < 0)
virXMLPropUUID parses into a buffer which is not a string (NUL-byte
terminated) but a byte array ...
> + return -1;
> +
> + addr->token.isSet = 1;
> +
> + return 0;
+}
+
Two empty lines between functions.
int
virCCWDeviceAddressParseXML(xmlNodePtr node,
virCCWDeviceAddress *addr)
diff --git a/src/conf/domain_conf.c b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
index 4435ee2ad4..cceb1d3b83 100644
--- a/src/conf/domain_conf.c
+++ b/src/conf/domain_conf.c
@@ -5389,6 +5389,11 @@ virDomainDeviceInfoFormat(virBuffer *buf,
info->addr.pci.zpci.uid.value,
info->addr.pci.zpci.fid.value);
}
+ if (virPCIVFIOTokenIDIsPresent(&info->addr.pci.token)) {
+ virBufferAsprintf(&childBuf,
+ "<vf-token uuid='%s'/>\n",
+ info->addr.pci.token.uuid);
... but here you use a *string* formatting function. So this will either
not print any reasonable output or potentially crash if the UUID
contains no NUL-bytes.
You would figure this out if you'd add any tests for this feature which
is in fact required. It is okay to add the tests at the end though.
+ }
break;
case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_DRIVE:
diff --git a/src/conf/schemas/basictypes.rng b/src/conf/schemas/basictypes.rng
index 26eb538077..bf2c30dd18 100644
--- a/src/conf/schemas/basictypes.rng
+++ b/src/conf/schemas/basictypes.rng
@@ -138,6 +138,17 @@
</element>
</optional>
</define>
+ <define name="vf-tokenid">
+ <optional>
+ <element name="vf-token">
+ <optional>
+ <attribute name="uuid">
+ <ref name="UUID"/>
+ </attribute>
+ </optional>
+ </element>
+ </optional>
+ </define>
<!-- a 6 byte MAC address in ASCII-hex format, eg "12:34:56:78:9A:BC"
-->
<!-- The lowest bit of the 1st byte is the "multicast" bit. a
-->
diff --git a/src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng b/src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng
index a26986b5ce..b228a3ca73 100644
--- a/src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng
+++ b/src/conf/schemas/domaincommon.rng
@@ -7034,6 +7034,7 @@
</attribute>
<ref name="pciaddress"/>
<ref name="zpciaddress"/>
+ <ref name="vf-tokenid"/>
</group>
<group>
<attribute name="type">
Any XML addition _must_ come with correspondign documentation update.
Please document the new flag and how it's supposed to be used in
docs/formatdomain.rst.
diff --git a/src/libvirt_private.syms b/src/libvirt_private.syms
index 4e475d5b1a..0d4866cd56 100644
--- a/src/libvirt_private.syms
+++ b/src/libvirt_private.syms
@@ -3138,6 +3138,7 @@ virPCIHeaderTypeToString;
virPCIIsVirtualFunction;
virPCIStubDriverTypeFromString;
virPCIStubDriverTypeToString;
+virPCIVFIOTokenIDIsPresent;
virPCIVirtualFunctionListFree;
virZPCIDeviceAddressIsIncomplete;
virZPCIDeviceAddressIsPresent;
This hunk and all others most likely belong to the patch which was
defining the function or vice-versa.
diff --git a/src/util/virpci.c b/src/util/virpci.c
index 08b82708b1..dfb0f29182 100644
--- a/src/util/virpci.c
+++ b/src/util/virpci.c
@@ -2312,6 +2312,11 @@ virZPCIDeviceAddressIsPresent(const virZPCIDeviceAddress *addr)
return addr->uid.isSet || addr->fid.isSet;
}
+bool
+virPCIVFIOTokenIDIsPresent(const virPCIDeviceToken *token)
+{
+ return token->isSet;
+}
void
virPCIVirtualFunctionListFree(virPCIVirtualFunctionList *list)
--
2.25.1