On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 11:20:15 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:54:38PM +0100, Jiri Denemark wrote:
> +# if neither fedora nor rhel was defined, try to guess them from %{dist}
> +%if !0%{?rhel} && !0%{?fedora}
> +%define rhel %(echo "%{?dist}" | sed -ne
's/^\\.el\\([0-9]\\+\\).*/\\1/p')
> +%define fedora %(echo "%{?dist}" | sed -ne
's/^\\.fc\\?\\([0-9]\\+\\).*/\\1/p')
> +%endif
> +
> # A client only build will create a libvirt.so only containing
> # the generic RPC driver, and test driver and no libvirtd
> # Default to a full server + client build
What is the particular reason we need this ? %dist is set by
redhat-rpm-macros, which also sets %rhel/%fedora, so I would not
expect to have one but not the other
The reason is %rhel is not set at least on RHEL-5 and we want to have a single
spec file which is able to build the package correctly there. Not that I was
able to decode where the hack redhat-rpm-config tries to set anything like
%dist or %rhel/%fedora but the macros are apparently set somewhere since,
e.g., on RHEL-6 one can build a package with make rpm. This doesn't work on
RHEL-5 without explicit --define "rhel 5".
Jirka