On 11/30/12 13:09, Ján Tomko wrote: > Commit 4efde75f introduced a return in the cleanup path and removed > virNWFilterConfLayerShutdown. > > Found by coverity: > Error: UNREACHABLE (CWE-561): > libvirt-0.10.2/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c:259: unreachable: This > code cannot be reached: "nwfilterDriverUnlock(driver...". > --- > I wonder if the if (!privileged) check should be moved before driverState > allocation? > --- > src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c | 11 +++++------ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c > b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c > index a0ee4f1..cd185e2 100644 > --- a/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c > +++ b/src/nwfilter/nwfilter_driver.c > @@ -174,8 +174,10 @@ nwfilterDriverStartup(bool privileged) > sysbus = virDBusGetSystemBus(); > #endif /* HAVE_DBUS */ > > - if (VIR_ALLOC(driverState) < 0) > - goto alloc_err_exit; > + if (VIR_ALLOC(driverState) < 0) { > + virReportOOMError(); > + return -1; > + } > > if (virMutexInit(&driverState->lock) < 0) > goto err_free_driverstate; > @@ -247,10 +249,7 @@ error: > nwfilterDriverUnlock(driverState); > nwfilterDriverShutdown(); > > -alloc_err_exit: > - return -1; When you remove this hunk you cause any jump to the error label to fall through all of the following labeled error cleanup sections. Those sections are also called in nwfilterDriverShutdown(). I'm wondering if the functions are safe to call even if the driver wasn't initialized completely. In that case we might be just calling nwfilterDriverShutdown() and get rid of the cleanup labels. If we're not allowed to do that, the return statement has to stay there.

> - > - nwfilterDriverUnlock(driverState); > + virNWFilterConfLayerShutdown(); > > err_techdrivers_shutdown: > virNWFilterTechDriversShutdown(); > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list