On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 16:12 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:33:24PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> > Yeah my first reaction was to provide XML based configuration files
> >that libvir would be able to understand, but I really think the
> >configurations
> >may come from very varied sources possibly databases. That's why I would
> >rather have the library agnostic when it comes to what a configuration
> >may look like.
> >
> >
> I'll have to think about this one. My biggest fear is that if there are
> a bunch of management tools capable of creating domains you'll end up
> with a bunch of different places storing configs.
I expect my QA engineers and the developpers to store their configs in
different places on the test cluster :-) you really expect people to
use a unified storage ? I didn't expect it myself.
There should be (at least) suggested and by distributions supported way
how to share domain configurations between more tools. I think we can
support both -- unified storage (/etc/something) and API that allows to
use customized storages (e.g. databases).
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak(a)redhat.com>