On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 14:18:24 +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
On 7/13/21 11:11 AM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 08:44:06 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> We document that our coding style is to use postfix increment in
>> for() loops rather than prefix. This change was generated by the
>> following sed script:
>>
>> for i in $(git grep -l "for (.*; ++.*)"); do \
>> sed -i 's/\(for (.*; \)++\(.*\))/\1\2++)/' $i; \
>> done
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn(a)redhat.com>
>> ---
>
> NACK this is mostly pointless churn.
>
Fair enough. I just wanted us to be compliant with our coding style
guide. But I can live with this patch unmerged.
I'll be okay if you add a syntax check, but just fixing it is not worth
it in this instance.